Selasa, 3 Ogos 2010

Kopitiam Bang Nan

Kopitiam Bang Nan

Tak de mananya telur ayam jadi telur ostrich...!!

Posted: 03 Aug 2010 06:48 PM PDT

Malam tadi adalah malam yang agak meletihkan.

Mungkin sebab siangnya teman ke sana ke mari menguruskan hal2 pejabat.

Malam pulak menghadiri Mesyuarat Pas Cawangan Bukit Indah di ofis Hj. Ghani. Lebih letih bila tengok kawan2 yang dijemput dengan segala hormatnya tak datang. SMS sudah, jemput mulutpun sudah…tak nak datang jugak. Nak buat guano??? Mungkin lepas ni nak kena buat representasi ke rumah2 kot? Kesian Lobaiman.

Namun kecewa sepatutnya tiada dalam kamus seorang pejuang. Cuma terasa agak letih…itu sahaja.

Respect teman tengok kawan2 macam lawyer kita yang sentiasa sibuk…tetapi tak pernah miss dalam event2 penting parti. Tak banyak cakap. Cuma berkata2 bila perlu. Walaupun perut senak kerana terlebih makan gulai kemahang…

Memang tak banyak yang tercapai dalam mesyuarat yang diadakan sebulan sekali ini tetapi ianya lebih baik dari keadaannya sebelum pertemuan dengan YB di DePalma bulan Februari yang lalu. Isu2 besar telah berjaya diatasi dan kini adalah masa untuk mengimplementasi.

Ada beberapa program yang telah diatur malam tadi untuk dilaksanakan oleh PAS Cawangan dalam masa yang terdekat ini. Apa yang diperlukan ialah man power. Tetapi ianya tak 'forthcoming' kata orang kampong teman.

Mee Panjang dah tak nak terlibat lagi dah. Bila diusik oleh lawyer tentang semangat juangnya yang tidak diserlahkan, apa dia kata?

"Telor teman dan jadi telor masin dah…!!" Jawabnya melawak…he he..

Teman faham kawan2 ni…ramai yang menunggu musim pilihanraya sahaja untuk turun. Nak beraktiviti secara konsisten ni ramai yang tak berkeupayaan. Tapi tu lah…kalu Mee Panjang sibuk dengan projek 'telur masin'nya…yang lain tu tak kan sibuk dengan projek nak membesorkan telur masing2. Teman nak bagitau, telur ayam tak kan jadi telur ostrich!!

Suka sangatlah teman kalu kawan2 yang dijemput dapat mengorbankan sedikit quality time dengan keluarga untuk sekurang2nya ambil tahu dengan apa yang berlaku. Kalu menyampah dengan temanpun…kesianlah kat Lobaiman yang istiqamah bekerja kuat untuk parti.

Prime Minister In Waiting's Speech...

Posted: 03 Aug 2010 06:10 PM PDT

MACAM MANA DAN BILA AGAKNYA SISTEM KEHAKIMAN NEGARA DAPAT DIPULIHKAN??????

Posted: 03 Aug 2010 09:29 AM PDT

TAKING JUSTICE SERIOUSLY : Tudung or not, MACC Should Stop Wasting Taxpayers' Money
by Din Merican

On Saturday July 30, Anwar Ibrahim mesmerized the audience at the 15th Malaysian Law Conference with his closing speech – " Taking Justice Seriously". Anwar mentioned the persecution of Malaysia's most celebrated blogger, Raja Petra Kamaruddin, more famously known as RPK. He compared RPK's flight to England to that of Emile Zola who did the same almost a century earlier. Both men had reckoned that it would be foolish to submit to an utterly corrupt and unjust system.

To Anwar's credit, he did not breathe a word about his own continuing trial in Sodomy II that was about to take place on Monday August 2. To Anwar's credit, he spoke about all other persecutions except his own. To Anwar's credit, he is standing his ground to seek his vindication in the courts of law in Malaysia. He is taking justice seriously.

The Tudung Affair: A Sub-Plot in Sodomy 2 Trial

So on August 2, the road to the Jalan Duta Court Complex became choked with traffic again. The main lobby of the court house was crowded again. Security was tight.The Police screened everyone from free access to the corridors of justice. And all that because Anwar Ibrahim was in court again. However , Anwar's case did not proceed. It did not proceed because of the scandal involving DPP Farah Azlina Latif and Saiful Bukhari.

Looking at DPP Farah who wears the tudung, one would expect she would have a certain aversion to a man who publicly claimed to have been sodomised. Well, obviously this woman DPP is not very discerning. On the other hand, Saiful, a strong young man in his late 20s, who says he was overpowered by a 60+ old man to the point of being sodomised , obviously could not restrain his own manly urge, such that even a tudung clad DPP of Farah Azlina's appearance could tempt him. It is as if there is divine intervention to show the cracks in the prosecution's case.

Dato Ramli Yusuff back in court

While all this drama was taking place, in another court room of the same Jalan Duta Court Complex, the trial of Dato' Ramli Yusuff, former Director Commercial Crime Investigations Division, was quietly taking place. What? Another trial?

Dato' Ramli Yusuff, former Director Commercial Crime Investigations Division
Hadn't Dato' Ramli already been acquitted? Didn't Judge Supang Lian of Kota Kinabalu Sessions Court acquit him without even calling for his defence? Isn't this the same Judge who found IGP Musa Hassan to be "an incredible witness whose evidence is not to be believed"? Didn't Judge M. Gunalen of KL Sessions Court also acquit Dato' Ramli without calling for his defence after holding that the Prosecution could not even prove a prima facie case? In other words, Dato' Ramli was fixed! Didn't the A-G appeal in Sabah and again lost in the High Court?

All this was revived again when Dato' Ramli appeared before Judge SM Komathy Suppiah on that Monday . What the public did not know was that IGP Musa Hassan and his co-conspirator, the AG, Gani Patail, had fixed up another charge against Dato' Ramli. When they realized that the joy ride charge and the small change charge could not stick, they cooked up another charge. This time it was for being a shareholder and director of a company called Kinsajaya Sdn Bhd in 2006 without having prior approval. This escaped a lot of attention because they made this a Summons case. Whether Summons or arrest case, it is still a criminal case. This shows the vindictiveness of IGP Musa Hassan and AG Gani Patail.

The only problem with this new charge is that Dato' Ramli did have approval! Not only that, the paper trail clearly showed that the application for approval was submitted by Dato' Ramli through the PDRM's head of administration, Dato' Rubiah, who had already confirmed this fact in the Sabah case earlier. Yet, AG Gani Patail was intent that Dato' Ramli must still be charged for this additional offence, which is not even an offence. That is what distressed both the DPP Ahmad Bache and DPP Ahmed Sazle. That is what was written on their faces, when they were shown the application letters filed by Dato' Ramli to KDN and to then IGP Tan Sri Bakri. The good DPP Ahmad Bache even said to Dato' Ramli's counsel that Dato' Ramli should send in a representation to seek a withdrawal of this charge. But that begets the question, if the AG, if the Prosecution has no case, shouldn't they be honourable enough and withdraw the charge?

Unfortunately, these good DPPs will claim that they are but foot soldiers. Their excuse would be that they are just doing their job- "hanya menjalankan tugas dan mengikut perintah ". Unfortunately, I do not subscribe to that. Unfortunately, I do not buy the line that civil servants can hide behind the cloak of "mengikut perintah" to commit or perpetuate wrongs directed by their bosses. That was the fundamental message explained by Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah in the book The Shafee Yahya Story thus : " I believe it should not be blind loyalty if the instructions are not right and not in accordance with government policy and general orders. In other words, a civil servant must be direct, be truthful and impartial and be brave enough to say "no" if asked to do things that are not right". He must have integrity.

Clearly being man of letters and law, these DPPs can tell that what they have been directed to do by AG Gani is not right. It would be wrong and against the principles of "Am'r Maaruf Nahy Mungkar" and against the laws of this country to fix anyone. It would be especially wrong for them to proceed with the trial when they can see that this charge under the Penal Code would require mens rea or the "criminal intent". For that matter, most if not all criminal cases would require a criminal intent.

The criminal intent is clearly missing here because Dato' Ramli had applied for such approval. When Dato' Ramli showed these DPPs his application letter, they reacted with surprise, and then claimed that they have never seen that letter. If they have not seen it, then what kind of investigation did the MACC conduct? Or was one ever conducted in the first place before Dato' Ramli was charged? Already, in the other cases against Dato' Ramli, all the independent prosecution witnesses have admitted that they were only interviewed after Dato' Ramli was charged!

What is more baffling in this case is that the KDN approval letter to be a shareholder is there in Dato' Ramli's personal dossier kept with the Pentadbiran PDRM. But the approval letter of the then IGP Tan Sri Bakri is missing. It is common knowledge that since the time Musa Hassan became Deputy IGP to Tan Sri Bakri, he had started to dig up on Dato Ramli's files. Could the missing letter of approval from Tan Sri Bakri have anything to do with Musa Hassan? Did Musa Hassan make it disappear? After all, Musa Hassan and AG Gani Patail have already been implicated in several allegations for fabrication of evidence.

Whatever may be the case, it would have been so easy to establish this fact. Interview Tan Sri Bakri and ask him. Apparently, the MACC did not want to do that because they knew that Tan Sri Bakri's answer would totally destroy their case. They knew that Tan Sri Bakri had informed his old squad mates R.Mogana Krishnan and Arif Khamis that he had given the approval. Because of that, the MACC DPPs have not even listed Tan Sri Bakri as one of their 12 witnesses.

From what I have seen in court yesterday and during the Rosli Dahlan trial, these DPPs do not take justice seriously.They play with people's lives and they behave in a cavalier manner. What infuriates me most is that there are so many abuses, so many crimes and so much corruption out there, and yet IGP Musa Hassan, AG Gani Patail and the MACC are indulging in frivolous prosecutions of the innocent. They are wasting public funds and taxpayers' money in pursuing cases like Dato' Ramli's and Lawyer Rosli Dahlan's.

Perhaps the time has come that we make the AG and the MACC accountable to pay costs if they lose cases against innocent men who have had to engage expensive lawyers to seek defend themselves. Perhaps, that will make them take justice seriously!

Bekas Wakil Rakyat BN Terbunuh...

Posted: 02 Aug 2010 11:32 PM PDT

(Breaking news) Assemblyman and female assistant dies, possibly due to being shot

G. Prakash
Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010 12:52:00

KUALA LUMPUR: The death of Permatang ex-state assemblyman Datuk Abdul Aziz Mohd Noh, is now believed to be caused by gunshot wounds to the head, instead of a car accident as previously reported.

There was also a second victim in the car, a woman. Police have identified her as Abdul Aziz's personal assistant, Siti Rohani. She also died with gunshot wounds to the head.

Selangor CPO Datuk Khalid Abu Bakar stated this on his Facebook status at about 1.25pm.

Khalid said initial investigations revealed that there were gunshot wounds on both the victims' heads. The gunshots were believed to have came from inside the car they were travelling in.

Police found a pistol near the scene. They believe the pistol is Abdul Aziz's. The weapon is currently in the police's safekeeping.

Earlier, we reported that the Abdul Aziz had died in a car crash near Sungai Buloh, several kilometres after the Sungai Buloh R&R area, about 10am this morning.

We had quoted Gombak police chief Abd Rahim Abdullah, who said based on initial information, the car had skidded and overturned.

PERKOSA DI DALAM BAHASA INGGERIS IALAH 'RAPE!!"

Posted: 02 Aug 2010 11:22 PM PDT


Perkosa = Rape = An assault by a person involving sexual intercourse with another person without that person's consent = Alahai Brahing...Rogol dalam bahasa mu...!!

Pelajaran bahasa Inggeris untuk Ibrahim Ali
John Malott
Ogos 3, 10
12:41pm

Kongsi 44KOMENTAR Apabila saya bangkit pada pagi Isnin lalu, saya melayari laman sesawang Malaysiakini dan mendapati saya menjadi sasaran demonstrasi di Kedutaan Amerika Syarikat di Kuala Lumpur.

Saya tidak pasti sama ada saya terkejut ataupun ia satu penghormatan. Ketika saya menjadi duta, seringkali terjadi demonstrasi terhadap Amerika Syarikat - semuanya membabitkan isu serius.

Tetapi demonstrasi yang dilakukan adalah terhadap diri saya? Ini hanya semata-mata saya berkata benar dan menamakan PERKASA sebagai kumpulan militan? Semuanya berlaku kerana ketua PERKASA, Datuk Ibrahim Ali tidak boleh membezakan antara adjektif (kata sifat) dengan 'kata benda'.

Isu ini bermula kerana bahasa Inggeris bukan bahasa ibubunda Ibrahim. Saya tidak menyalahkannya kerana dia tidak faham perbezaan itu dalam bahasa Inggeris. Ia bukan bahasa ibundanya. Saya berharap saya mengetahui lebih banyak bahasa Melayu.

Bagaimanapun sebelum seseorang berhujah dengan berkobar-kobar selama dua minggu dengan menuduh saya sebagai "tolol" dan "bodoh" (stupid) serta mengetuai bantahan ke atas kedutaan Amerika, sekurang-kurangnya perbetulkan dahulu fakta anda.

Namun nampaknya, Ibrahim tidak ambil peduli. Beliau gembira dengan publisiti yang diterimanya di media massa.

Saya labelkan PERKASA sebagai kumpulan militan Melayu, yang mana ia memang bersifat demikian. Apabila saya menggunakan perkataan 'militan' ia digunakan sebagai adjektif. Ia membawa maksud 'perwatakan yang agresif' atau 'semangat baja dalam perjuangan', sebagai contoh 'aktivis hak asasi manusia yang militan'.

Ibrahim sepatutnya menerimanya sebagai satu pujian.

Apabila perkataan 'militan' digunakan sebagai adjektif, perkataan itu tidak membawa maksud seseorang itu menggunakan keganasan.

Jadi apabila saya menyentuh mengenai PERKASA - hanya enam perkataan dalam rencana pengarang saya yang berjumlah lebih kurang 800 perkataan berhubung "kumpulan baru militan yang bernama PERKASA - saya tidak menggunakannya sebagai 'kata benda'. Saya gunakannya sebagai 'kata sifat' - menunjukkan agesif atau bersungguh-sungguh.

Itu adalah perkataan yang tepat bagi menghuraikan Ibrahim. Saksikan sahaja videonya dan anda akan faham apa yang saya maksudkan. Beliau seseorang yang sedia bergaduh memperjuangkan apa yang dipegangnya. Beliau seorang yang agresif.

Tetapi saya tidak pernah melabelkan PERKASA sebagai kumpulan yang terbabit dengan keganasan atau terorisme.

Bagi rakan-rakan saya di Washington, isu berkenaan boleh diselesaikan dengan mudah jika Ibrahim hanya merujuk kamus Oxford English.

JOHN R MALOTT adalah duta Amerika Syarikat ke Malaysia dari 1995-1998.
Dicatat oleh di

Tiada ulasan:

Catat Ulasan

Langgan: Catat Ulasan (Atom)