Jumaat, 16 Disember 2011

Kopitiam Bang Nan

Kopitiam Bang Nan

Zaid, Asal Bukan UMNO...tapi bukan KITAlah...Hehe!!

Posted: 16 Dec 2011 03:29 PM PST

We have bigger fish to fry
ZAID IBRAHIM

Four months ago, I wrote about Defence Minister Datuk Seri Zahid Hamidi and Co. wanting to purchase six more Second Generation Patrol Vessels or SGPVs for the Navy. The story was ignored by the public ; and so I have to write this again.

Some of you will recall that when the Government decided to privatise the Lumut Naval Dockyard in the early 1990s to the man with the white hair Tan Sri Amin Shah Omar, that exercise also entailed the Government buying six patrol vessels from him for the Navy.

That exercise cost taxpayers RM9 billion: RM6 billion for the patrol vessels and RM3 billion for interest charges for late payments and exchange rate losses. Amin Shah ordered the vessels from the German company Blohm + Voss. Apart from procuring the six patrol vessels, Lumut Naval Dockyard (now Boustead Naval Shipyard) also paid RM300 million for their design so that we could build additional units ourselves if we needed them in future. "Malaysia Boleh!" was, after all, the rallying cry then, and our defence officials have never failed to brandish the catchphrase, "transfer of technology".

Fast-forward 15 years later and our current Defence Minister has decided to buy another six patrol vessels. It will cost more this time, naturally, since these are second generation SGPVs with a new design to be built by another company, DCNS. Why we are not using the design that we paid so much for is something we should be thinking about. And why Zahid and Boustead Naval Shipyard have decided to change our supplier to DCNS is anybody's guess.

All I can confirm is that DCNS is a famous company because DCNS supplied us Scorpene submarines (a deal in which someone equally famous got RM500 million in duit kopi). DCNS is also involved in a corruption scandal in Taiwan, where they had been sued by the Taiwan government for recovery of more than USD1 billion for a kickback scandal.

So how much will this new procurement cost Malaysian taxpayers? The new vessels' combat and management system will be decided by some foreign consultants and not by the Royal Malaysian Navy, so your guess is as good as mine. But it's not just the money I am worried about. The consultants are Singapore based companies. Are they not foreigners?. What if they recommend a system that compromises our national security? What assurance do we have that these consultants are not our enemies? Every time we question the Government's secrecy in the procurement of defence equipment, we are told that it's in our national interests to be kept in the dark. Now I know why.

I am certain that input from our Royal Navy into this very important procurement has been minimal at best. So we can expect an announcement later that will sound something like this: the base price for the vessels is RM10 billion while the maintenance, training and parts contracts will cost RM1 billion a year for 10 years. That means Tabung Angkatan Tentera, which has the controlling stake in Boustead Holdings, and ordinary Malaysians (who will be getting RM500 soon) must be prepared to shoulder the burden of a RM20 billion defence contract for vessels that neither you nor I can even be sure we need.

I know many of you are excited about the cow scandal now engulfing Women, Family and Community Development Minister Dato' Sri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil. But that's peanuts compared to what's cooking at the Defence Ministry. It's comical and unfair for some UMNO leaders to ask Shahrizat to resign when they are all in the same pot.

For the moment, I hope our Defence Minister or Prime Minister can answer three simple questions: firstly, are we buying the six patrol vessels from DCNS and for how much? Secondly, why were foreign consultants engaged, to the exclusion of the Navy, to recommend combat systems and other sensitive components of the vessels? And thirdly, why are we not having a competitive bid for this project? I hope we can get some answers soon, before the General Election.

Dialog Santai Bersama YB Khasim Abdul Aziz

Posted: 16 Dec 2011 03:56 AM PST

Semua penduduk Taman Bukit Indah, Ampang dijemput untuk sama-sama bersarapan pagi dan berdialog bersama YB Khasim Abdul Aziz, ADUN Lembah Jaya pada hari Ahad ini, 18hb. Disember, 2011 @ 8.30 pagi - 12.00 tengahari.

Majlis ini dianjurkan oleh JKP Zon 11.

Tempat - Taman Rekreasi Taman Bukit Indah (bersebelahan dengan tapak permainan helikopter).

Lahabau tul Don ni...!!

Posted: 15 Dec 2011 10:00 PM PST

Anwar: Mahathir asked World Bank for aid
Kuek Ser Kuang Keng
11:40AM Dec 16, 2011

Opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim made a startling allegation against Dr Mahathir Mohamad, claiming that the former prime minister had written to the World Bank for funds during the financial crisis in 1999.

In an effort to clear the "US agent" label against him by Umno and Mahathir, Anwar last night told a dinner attended by foreign ambassadors that in 1993, he had written to the World Bank in his capacity as finance minister to reject financial assistance.

"Of course, I had to chair the development committee of International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank. For that I was portrayed as American agent, but the fact remains it was me in 1993 who wrote to the World Bank to say we are not requiring your fund.

"In 1999, the then prime minister Mahathir wrote to the president of World Bank appealing for funds and (to) borrow from World Bank," he claimed.

The dinner was organised by the Selangor state government where Anwar delivered a speech entitled 'Debunking ETP: Widening Income Gap' to some 150 guests including foreign ambassadors, economists, academicians, MPs, party leaders and journalists.

Wasn't that a paradox?

Anwar, who is also the Selangor economic advisor, was asked whether Malaysia is prepared to brace itself against the Eurozone crisis, but he digressed from the question and recounted the difference between him and Mahathir during the crisis.

The PKR de facto leader said he was unaware of Mahathir's action as he was jailed in 1999, and only discovered it during his consultancy work for the World Bank after he was freed.

"Wasn't that a paradox? Anwar who was accused as dependant of the World Bank decided to stop borrowing from the World Bank, but the guy who was anti-IMF and World Bank wrote quietly asking for funds," he said.

Anwar was the finance minister from 1993 to 1998 under Mahathir's administration. Their mentor-protege relationship collapsed during the 1997 Asian financial crisis leading to the sacking of Anwar.

He was then found guilty of sodomy and power abuse which landed him behind the bars for five years until 2004.

Mahathir, who has been portraying himself as an anti-western imperialism leader, accused Anwar of selling out the country by accepting the austerity package prescribed by IMF.

Penjelasan behubung isu Hasan Ali dan Nasharudin

Posted: 15 Dec 2011 09:56 PM PST



Interview penuh boleh diikuti di sini...
Dicatat oleh di

Tiada ulasan:

Catat Ulasan

Langgan: Catat Ulasan (Atom)