Jumaat, 4 Mac 2011

Kopitiam Bang Nan

Kopitiam Bang Nan

Rasanya...baiklah Zaid settle kes ni dulu..!!

Posted: 04 Mar 2011 07:02 PM PST

http://anti-zahid.blogspot.com/2009/01/memeranjatkan-video-temuramah-penuh.html

Itulah...dok seronok sangat bersekongkol dengan mat ketayap putar alam tu...

Kau ingat menteri Turki tu bodoh sangat ke sampai senang sangat Anwar boleh gelembong dia?

Kau ingat Duta Turki kat sini tak gheti bahasa ke? Silap2 dia fasih ngomong Jowo Bagan Datoh wak oi...

Ke kau yang tak berapa cerdik cakap omputih...hehe!!


Kes liwat II: Zahid dakwa Anwar bohongi Turki



JASIN, 5 Mac — Menteri Pertahanan Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi mendakwa Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim telah membohongi kepimpinan tertinggi Turki berhubung kes liwat yang membabitkan pembantu peribadinya Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan tiga tahun lalu.

Kata Ahmad Zahid, Anwar yang merupakan Ketua Umum Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) memberitahu kepimpinan kerajaan Turki bahawa kes liwat melibatkan Mohd Saiful adalah kes lama iaitu tahun 1998 yang dibuka semula kertas siasatan oleh Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak.

"Baru-baru ini saya ada ke Turki dan berjumpa Perdana Menteri Turki Recep Tayyip Erdogan, dulu ada tokoh pembangkang Anwar Ibrahim kata Turki adalah negara yang memberikan sokongan moral kepada beliau dan pernah terbang ke Turki untuk dapatkan bantuan politik atau sokongan politik, duduk di rumah Kedutaan Turki.

"Saya lakukan siasatan, rupa-rupanya Anwar Ibrahim ini rapat dengan Menteri Luar Turki Ahmet Davutoglu, menteri luar ini bekas pensyarah di UIA (Universiti Islam Antarabangsa) ketika Anwar Ibrahim jadi presiden UIA," katanya ketika menyampaikan ceramah di Pentas Rakyat sempena kempen pilihan raya kecil Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) Merlimau di Merlimau Pasir di sini malam tadi.

Kira-kira 150 orang menghadiri ceramah itu yang turut disertai Timbalan Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri Datuk Ahmad Maslan dan Ketua Menteri Sabah Datuk Seri Musa Aman.

Ahmad Zahid yang juga naib presiden Umno berkata, dalam pertemuan itu beliau diberitahu Ahmet bahawa Anwar meminta supaya diberikan perlindungan daripada ditangkap.

"Menteri Luar ini beritahu Perdana Menteri Turki untuk beri perlindungan kepada Anwar Ibrahim, tapi Allah s.w.t maha adil . . . pada majlis makan malam saya kebetulan duduk di sebelah Menteri Luar ini.

"Saya tanya beliau, adakah Anwar Ibrahim ini kawan beliau? Beliau kata betul, saya tanya selalu Anwar Ibrahim hubungi beliau? Dulu selalu, sekarang dah tak ada. Bila kali terakhir Anwar Ibrahim hubungi beliau? Beliau jawab setahun setengah lalu.

"Tapi Anwar Ibrahim beritahu kita tiap-tiap bulan beliau ada jumpa, malah Anwar Ibrahim jelaskan kepada masyarakat Turki bahawa kes di mahkamah sekarang adalah kes sama yang dihidupkan . . . dibuka fail oleh Datuk Seri Najib Razak," katanya.

Tambah Naib Presiden Umno itu, pihaknya termasuk menjelaskan perkara sebenar kepada kerajaan Turki mengenai situasi yang berlaku.

"Bila perwakilan Malaysia terangkan, ini kes baru... bukan kes lama dan Datuk Seri Najib Razak tak ada niat untuk menganiayai Anwar Ibrahim.

"Ini kes yang beliau buat sendiri, yang melapor adalah Saiful bukan Saiful yang diarahkan . . . dia jadi imam Anwar Ibrahim jadi makmum," katanya.

Kes liwat yang melibatkan Anwar itu masih berjalan di mahkamah.

Anwar didakwa meliwat Mohd Saiful di Unit 11-5-1 Kondominium Desa Damansara, Jalan Setiakasih, Bukit Damansara di sini antara 3.01 petang dan 4.30 petang pada 26 Jun 2008.

Sudah terang lagi bersuluh....

Posted: 04 Mar 2011 06:53 PM PST

Dipetik dari Malaysiakini...

112 statement allegedly tampered? So what's new?

'I am not surprised that they have tampered with the 112 statement. Even Altantuya's immigration records have been deleted.'

Sodomy II: Anwar's back on witness stand

Cala: Who can be trusted? Somebody had tampered with the '112 statement' recorded from Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim on July 16-17, 2008. Who could they be? Who else? Surely one would not expect an ordinary police to do that.

For a clue, please look at the incentive structure of those who would stand to benefit if Anwar is not there. You are right. It must have been done after receiving orders from certain persons truly powerful.

You are also day-dreaming and totally out of sync with reality if you think those in uniforms are people worthy of our trust.

Bluemountains: I am not surprised that they have tampered with the 112 statement. Even Altantuya Shaariibuu's immigration records have been deleted. And yet, neither the government, the attorney-general, the police nor the judiciary is interested to know who ordered the deletion. It must be C4ed.

Alan Goh: I am not a fan of DSAI but there are too many holes, if and buts presented by the prosecution.

The Hospital Puswari doctor said no penetration but HKL (Hospital Kuala Lumpur) doctors said there was. The forensic DNA said not one but three types of semen found, again probably the third DNA due to sitting on the toilet bowl.

Come on, Malaysians are not stupid and when you sent 10-15 police in balaclava just to arrest a 62-year-old guy with a back problem, it speaks volumes of the Sodomy II trial. Every Malaysian is asking, "when will this humiliation to the PDRM, judiciary and doctors end just to castrate an opposition leader who is seen as a threat to Umno.

Use your head, you cannot break walls merely by throwing eggs at it. Enough is enough.

Louis: Anwar's case is just a ploy by Najib to divert our attention from many of his shortcomings and many revelations of the country's scandals.

Why waste so much time in trying to nail Anwar? Look at the team of prosecutors who could easily be deployed to take on high-profile cases like PKFZ (Port Klang Free Zone) or Dr Mohd Khir Toyo's alleged charges.

Those cases involve millions of ringgit, if not billions. Don't you think it is more worthwhile to pursue those cases. Instead, they are barking up the wrong trees.

Peter Clement Goh: Here are the possible outcomes of the trial.
1) Judge will rule in favour of the prosecution in the trial within trial - evidence will be allowed. Male Y will be Anwar and jail sentence pronounced in time for GE. (30/70 chance of happening).

2) Judge will rule in favour of the defence in the trial within trial - evidence will be disallowed. Male Y will be Anwar, and prosecution will find "other" evidence. (50/50)

3) Judge will rule in favour of the defence in the trial within trial - evidence will be disallowed. Male Y will be Anwar, judge will throw out the case because of a technicality but the DNA already shows that it is Anwar so Anwar will be discredited (70/30 - most likely scenario as this will make the judgment more favourable to the rest of the world, and Umno will then sing for joy that DSAI (Anwar) "was indeed in Saiful").

With scenario 3 - the judgment would be "fair" and PM Najib Razak wins (Mahathir will say to the world that he was right all along).

Pemerhati: Since Mahathir's time, one of Umno's strategy has been to waste huge amounts of the taxpayers money by using the bloated bureaucracy, the enforcement agencies and the judiciary to harass the opposition.

It carries out unfair prosecutions of the opposition leaders and protestors (e.g. Sodomy I and II, the Human Rights Party leaders and demonstrators) to sap their energies and resources. The Sodomy I and II cases have been planned and executed by the very top Umno leaders.

In this case, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan met Najib and his officers (co-conspirators and executors of the frame-up?) prior to lodging a report against Anwar. Saiful said he was forcefully sodomised, but then went on to say he had sex several times and once came out from the bathroom clad in a towel to have sex.

This clearly shows he was a willing party and thus is lying. The people who planned the whole frame-up did not coach him well. Najib will decide the verdict in this case, but in the meantime he is happy that the opposition is being harassed.


Cop: I told lawyer of Section 337B arrest

Naaah!: The purpose of the arrest is clear - to obtain Anwar's DNA. When this was not done in the hospital, Anwar had to be detained overnight and the next morning the whole lock-up was searched thoroughly for his hairs, etc.

Mob1900: What's the court waiting for? Law enforcement officers who didn't know the law blindly followed orders from the brass with total disregard of the procedure and practices.

•Arrest was made with 'overwhelming force' (more a dozen of police officers) on one 'suspect'.
•No warrant was produced during the arrest.
•'Suspect' had earlier promised to cooperate at a given date, time and venue and yet was taken in a rash manner in order to humiliate.
•Officers who lied about informing the suspect and his lawyer about the charges against him.
•Abuse of facilities/personnel in the name of arresting one suspect, yes, only one suspect.
Confused: You mean the police require 10 to 15 members of the Special Action Unit wearing balaclava and armed with sub-machine guns to arrest a person for sodomy?

R Venugopal: DSAI, be patient and the truth shall surface. It is a pity that you have to go through the humiliation, time and again. Remember, there are always people behind you all the way till the battle is over. Let us all strengthen our resolve to face PRU13.

Anonymous_3db7: Forgotten to bring along the arrest warrant but did not forget to get 15 clowns to arrest an unarmed civilian?

Anwar Tibai Pencacai Umno...!!

Posted: 03 Mar 2011 10:38 PM PST
Dicatat oleh di

Tiada ulasan:

Catat Ulasan

Langgan: Catat Ulasan (Atom)