Khamis, 1 Julai 2010

RAKYAT MARHAEN

RAKYAT MARHAEN

New movement in Gerakan pushing for reforms

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:49 PM PDT
koh-tsu-koon-teng-chang-yeow-gerakanKUALA LUMPUR - A movement called "Geraklah Gerakan", believed to be linked to a former senior leader in Gerakan, has been criss-crossing the country the past one-and-a-half months pushing for reforms in the party.

The movement's objective is to get party members to support their reform initiatives which include limiting the tenure of the party president and leaders holding government posts to two terms and other changes in the Gerakan's central working committee and central committee.

"They have been active for the past one-and-a-half months, sending out e-mails and using social networking sites such as Facebook to push their reform agenda. These people are very brave and honest about it," a party insider told Bernama.

Termed "gG Movement" (repeat gG movement), it's said to be gaining momentum as it's very much grassroot-based and run by "a group of grassroot leaders from Penang".

Gerakan secretary-general Teng Chang Yeow confirmed the existence of the movement but said the party practised democracy which "allows for dissent on the ground to surface" as long as the unity and stability of the party was not threatened.

Sentiment on the ground

"For me, it is time for the party leadership to look at the sentiment on the ground...act on it. The way I see it, the movement is not calling for the replacement of the leadership, but merely wants the party to allow new and young leaders to emerge," he said.

Teng said he was not sure who was heading the movement but believed it involved a group of grassroot leaders from Penang.

The brains behind the gG movement still remains a mystery, although there was talk that some senior leaders are involved.

A check with one so-called grassroot leader, Ye Wan Chun, revealed that he was actually only responsible for setting up the movement's website and campaign on the Internet.

He explained that "gG" was the abbreviation for "Geraklah Gerakan" with the "small letter "g" like a pair of handcuffs, while the gG campaign logo colours are red and green, the colours of the political party, meaning that the movement was initiated and linked to it.

"Capital "G" refers to the political party (Parti Gerakan). Small letter "g" is the symbol of grassroot party members to move forward," he said.

Ye said members must break the stifling factionalism culture within the party, restore political independence and establish a new party culture so that Gerakan could regain the confidence of the people.

Movement "targeting the party president"

However, some party members said the movement was actually targeting party president Dr Koh Tsu Koon as they were said to be unhappy with his leadership, which they claimed failed to bring any changes to Gerakan since he assumed the presidency in 2008.

Asked to comment on the development,  Koh said he knew the person involved in the movement but regarded it as a "good and healthy dialogue" forum for the party.

"I do monitor their website and monitor their comment. I have taken into account some of their constructive criticism. It's basically a good grassroot movement not just for the party but the people as well," he said.

"Either at the national or state level, at the end, what is important is that party members need to realise that the party should be working for the people," he told Bernama in an interview.

'Petronas uses middlemen to sell crude oil'

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:48 PM PDT

By Patrick Lee
PETALING JAYA: Former land and cooperatives deputy minister Tan Kee Kwong has alleged that state-owned oil firm Petronas was using middlemen to sell its crude oil.
In an open letter to the government, Tan, who is now with PKR, dubbed the middlemen as "option holders" and claimed that Petronas was forced to sell crude oil to them at "ridiculously low prices".
He also alleged that in its contracts, Petronas had to sell a barrel of oil at a set price to these "option holders" even when price increases on the open market.
"Why does Petronas need to do this? Why can't it sell the crude oil on the open market?" he said, asking Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak to reveal these "option holders".
"You can imagine how much an option holder makes when the crude oil price increases," he added.
Reveal, Najib challenged
Meanwhile, Tan also pointed out that the billion-dollar Petronas has never tabled its accounts in Parliament.
He cited his experience as a member of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) in 2006, where PAC had requested the Finance Ministry to allow it to examine Petronas' accounts.
The committee, which comprises MPs from both sides of the divide, was told that Petronas did not come under the Finance Ministry portfolio, but rather the Prime Minister's Department.
"As a GLC (government-linked company), Petronas belongs to the citizens of Malaysia," said Tan.
The former deputy minister also challenged Najib to open up Petronas' account books for public scrutiny.
"If the government does not dare reveal Petronas' accounts in Parliament, then they have plenty to hide," he said.
Tan added that a former Petronas employee had told him that if the PKR leader found out more about the background and purported political interference, "it would give me a heart attack".

Top 10 myths about the Palestinian conflict

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:44 PM PDT

Jeremy R Hammond   

Myth #1 – Jews and Arabs have always been in conflict in the region
Although Arabs were a majority in Palestine prior to the creation of the state of Israel, there had always been a Jewish population, as well. For the most part, Jewish Palestinians got along with their Arab neighbors.

This began to change with the onset of the Zionist movement, because the Zionists rejected the right of the Palestinians to self-determination and wanted Palestine for their own, to create a "Jewish State" in a region where Arabs were the majority and owned most of the land.

For instance, after a series of riots in Jaffa in 1921 resulting in the deaths of 47 Jews and 48 Arabs, the occupying British held a commission of inquiry, which reported their finding that "there is no inherent anti-Semitism in the country, racial or religious." Rather, Arab attacks on Jewish communities were the result of Arab fears about the stated goal of the Zionists to take over the land.

After major violence again erupted in 1929, the British Shaw Commission report noted that "In less than 10 years three serious attacks have been made by Arabs on Jews. For 80 years before the first of these attacks there is no recorded instance of any similar incidents." Representatives from all sides of the emerging conflict testified to the commission that prior to the First World War, "the Jews and Arabs lived side by side if not in amity, at least with tolerance, a quality which today is almost unknown in Palestine."

The problem was that "The Arab people of Palestine are today united in their demand for representative government", but were being denied that right by the Zionists and their British benefactors.

The British Hope-Simpson report of 1930 similarly noted that Jewish residents of non-Zionist communities in Palestine enjoyed friendship with their Arab neighbors. "It is quite a common sight to see an Arab sitting in the verandah of a Jewish house", the report noted. "The position is entirely different in the Zionist colonies."

Myth #2 – The United Nations created Israel.
The U.N. became involved when the British sought to wash its hands of the volatile situation its policies had helped to create, and to extricate itself from Palestine. To that end, they requested that the U.N. take up the matter.

As a result, a U.N. Special Commission on Palestine (UNSCOP) was created to examine the issue and offer its recommendation on how to resolve the conflict. UNSCOP contained no representatives from any Arab country and in the end issued a report that explicitly rejected the right of the Palestinians to self-determination.

Rejecting the democratic solution to the conflict, UNSCOP instead proposed that Palestine be partitioned into two states: one Arab and one Jewish.

The U.N. General Assembly endorsed UNSCOP's in its Resolution 181. It is often claimed that this resolution "partitioned" Palestine, or that it provided Zionist leaders with a legal mandate for their subsequent declaration of the existence of the state of Israel, or some other similar variation on the theme. All such claims are absolutely false.

Resolution 181 merely endorsed UNSCOP's report and conclusions as a recommendation. Needless to say, for Palestine to have been officially partitioned, this recommendation would have had to have been accepted by both Jews and Arabs, which it was not.

Moreover, General Assembly resolutions are not considered legally binding (only Security Council resolutions are). And, furthermore, the U.N. would have had no authority to take land from one people and hand it over to another, and any such resolution seeking to so partition Palestine would have been null and void, anyway.
 



















Myth #3 – The Arabs missed an opportunity to have their own state in 1947.
The U.N. recommendation to partition Palestine was rejected by the Arabs. Many commentators today point to this rejection as constituting a missed "opportunity" for the Arabs to have had their own state. But characterizing this as an "opportunity" for the Arabs is patently ridiculous. The Partition plan was in no way, shape, or form an "opportunity" for the Arabs.

First of all, as already noted, Arabs were a large majority in Palestine at the time, with Jews making up about a third of the population by then, due to massive immigration of Jews from Europe (in 1922, by contrast, a British census showed that Jews represented only about 11 percent of the population).

Additionally, land ownership statistics from 1945 showed that Arabs owned more land than Jews in every single district of Palestine, including Jaffa, where Arabs owned 47 percent of the land while Jews owned 39 percent – and Jaffa boasted the highest percentage of Jewish-owned land of any district.

In other districts, Arabs owned an even larger portion of the land. At the extreme other end, for instance, in Ramallah, Arabs owned 99 percent of the land. In the whole of Palestine, Arabs owned 85 percent of the land, while Jews owned less than 7 percent, which remained the case up until the time of Israel's creation.

Yet, despite these facts, the U.N. partition recommendation had called for more than half of the land of Palestine to be given to the Zionists for their "Jewish State". The truth is that no Arab could be reasonably expected to accept such an unjust proposal. For political commentators today to describe the Arabs' refusal to accept a recommendation that their land be taken away from them, premised upon the explicit rejection of their right to self-determination, as a "missed opportunity" represents either an astounding ignorance of the roots of the conflict or an unwillingness to look honestly at its history.

It should also be noted that the partition plan was also rejected by many Zionist leaders. Among those who supported the idea, which included David Ben-Gurion, their reasoning was that this would be a pragmatic step towards their goal of acquiring the whole of Palestine for a "Jewish State" – something which could be finally accomplished later through force of arms.

When the idea of partition was first raised years earlier, for instance, Ben-Gurion had written that "after we become a strong force, as the result of the creation of a state, we shall abolish partition and expand to the whole of Palestine". Partition should be accepted, he argued, "to prepare the ground for our expansion into the whole of Palestine". The Jewish State would then "have to preserve order", if the Arabs would not acquiesce, "by machine guns, if necessary."

Myth #4 – Israel has a "right to exist".
The fact that this term is used exclusively with regard to Israel is instructive as to its legitimacy, as is the fact that the demand is placed upon Palestinians to recognize Israel's "right to exist", while no similar demand is placed upon Israelis to recognize the "right to exist" of a Palestinian state.

Nations don't have rights, people do. The proper framework for discussion is within that of the right of all peoples to self-determination. Seen in this, the proper framework, it is an elementary observation that it is not the Arabs which have denied Jews that right, but the Jews which have denied that right to the Arabs. The terminology of Israel's "right to exist" is constantly employed to obfuscate that fact.

As already noted, Israel was not created by the U.N., but came into being on May 14, 1948, when the Zionist leadership unilaterally, and with no legal authority, declared Israel's existence, with no specification as to the extent of the new state's borders. In a moment, the Zionists had declared that Arabs no longer the owners of their land – it now belonged to the Jews. In an instant, the Zionists had declared that the majority Arabs of Palestine were now second-class citizens in the new "Jewish State".

The Arabs, needless to say, did not passively accept this development, and neighboring Arab countries declared war on the Zionist regime in order to prevent such a grave injustice against the majority inhabitants of Palestine.

It must be emphasized that the Zionists had no right to most of the land they declared as part of Israel, while the Arabs did. This war, therefore, was not, as is commonly asserted in mainstream commentary, an act of aggression by the Arab states against Israel. Rather, the Arabs were acting in defense of their rights, to prevent the Zionists from illegally and unjustly taking over Arab lands and otherwise disenfranchising the Arab population. The act of aggression was the Zionist leadership's unilateral declaration of the existence of Israel, and the Zionists' use of violence to enforce their aims both prior to and subsequent to that declaration.

In the course of the war that ensued, Israel implemented a policy of ethnic cleansing. 700,000 Arab Palestinians were either forced from their homes or fled out of fear of further massacres, such as had occurred in the village of Deir Yassin shortly before the Zionist declaration. These Palestinians have never been allowed to return to their homes and land, despite it being internationally recognized and encoded in international law that such refugees have an inherent "right of return".

Palestinians will never agree to the demand made of them by Israel and its main benefactor, the U.S., to recognize Israel's "right to exist". To do so is effectively to claim that Israel had a "right" to take Arab land, while Arabs had no right to their own land. It is effectively to claim that Israel had a "right" to ethnically cleanse Palestine, while Arabs had no right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in their own homes, on their own land.

The constant use of the term "right to exist" in discourse today serves one specific purpose: It is designed to obfuscate the reality that it is the Jews that have denied the Arab right to self-determination, and not vice versa, and to otherwise attempt to legitimize Israeli crimes against the Palestinians, both historical and contemporary.

Myth #5 – The Arab nations threatened Israel with annihilation in 1967 and 1973
The fact of the matter is that it was Israel that fired the first shot of the "Six Day War". Early on the morning of June 5, Israel launched fighters in a surprise attack on Egypt (then the United Arab Republic), and successfully decimated the Egyptian air force while most of its planes were still on the ground.

It is virtually obligatory for this attack to be described by commentators today as "preemptive". But to have been "preemptive", by definition, there must have been an imminent threat of Egyptian aggression against Israel. Yet there was none.

It is commonly claimed that President Nasser's bellicose rhetoric, blockade of the Straits of Tiran, movement of troops into the Sinai Peninsula, and expulsion of U.N. peacekeeping forces from its side of the border collectively constituted such an imminent threat.

Yet, both U.S. and Israeli intelligence assessed at the time that the likelihood Nasser would actually attack was low. The CIA assessed that Israel had overwhelming superiority in force of arms, and would, in the event of a war, defeat the Arab forces within two weeks; within a week if Israel attacked first, which is what actually occurred.

It must be kept in mind that Egypt had been the victim of aggression by the British, French, and Israelis in the 1956 "Suez Crisis", following Egypt's nationalization of the Suez Canal. In that war, the three aggressor nations conspired to wage war upon Egypt, which resulted in an Israeli occupation of the Sinai Peninsula. Under U.S. pressure, Israel withdrew from the Sinai in 1957, but Egypt had not forgotten the Israeli aggression.

Moreover, Egypt had formed a loose alliance with Syria and Jordan, with each pledging to come to the aid of the others in the event of a war with Israel. Jordan had criticized Nasser for not living up to that pledge after the Israeli attack on West Bank village of Samu the year before, and his rhetoric was a transparent attempt to regain face in the Arab world.

That Nasser's positioning was defensive, rather than projecting an intention to wage an offensive against Israel, was well recognized among prominent Israelis. As Avraham Sela of the Shalem Center has observed, "The Egyptian buildup in Sinai lacked a clear offensive plan, and Nasser's defensive instructions explicitly assumed an Israeli first strike."

Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin acknowledged that "In June 1967, we again had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him."

Yitzhak Rabin, who would also later become Prime Minister of Israel, admitted in 1968 that "I do not think Nasser wanted war. The two divisions he sent to the Sinai would not have been sufficient to launch an offensive war. He knew it and we knew it."

Israelis have also acknowledged that their own rhetoric at the time about the "threat" of "annihilation" from the Arab states was pure propaganda.

General Chaim Herzog, commanding general and first military governor of the occupied West Bank following the war, admitted that "There was no danger of annihilation. Israeli headquarters never believed in this danger."

General Ezer Weizman similarly said, "There was never a danger of extermination. This hypothesis had never been considered in any serious meeting."

Chief of Staff Haim Bar-Lev acknowledged, "We were not threatened with genocide on the eve of the Six-Day War, and we had never thought of such possibility."

Israeli Minister of Housing Mordechai Bentov has also acknowledged that "The entire story of the danger of extermination was invented in every detail, and exaggerated a posteriori to justify the annexation of new Arab territory."

In 1973, in what Israelis call the "Yom Kippur War", Egypt and Syria launched a surprise offensive to retake the Sinai and the Golan Heights, respectively. This joint action is popularly described in contemporaneous accounts as an "invasion" of or act of "aggression" against Israel.

Yet, as already noted, following the June '67 war, the U.N. Security Council passed resolution 242 calling upon Israel to withdraw from the occupied territories. Israel, needless to say, refused to do so and has remained in perpetual violation of international law ever since.

During the 1973 war, Egypt and Syria thus "invaded" their own territory, then under illegal occupation by Israel. The corollary of the description of this war as an act of Arab aggression implicitly assumes that the Sinai Peninsula, Golan Heights, West Bank, and Gaza Strip were Israeli territory. This is, needless to say, a grossly false assumption that demonstrates the absolutely prejudicial and biased nature of mainstream commentary when it comes to the Israeli-Arab conflict.

This false narrative fits in with the larger overall narrative, equally fallacious, of Israeli as the "victim" of Arab intransigence and aggression. This narrative, largely unquestioned in the West, flips reality on its head.

Myth #6 – U.N. Security Council Resolution 242 called only for a partial Israeli withdrawal.
Resolution 242 was passed in the wake of the June '67 war and called for the "Withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict." While the above argument enjoys widespread popularity, it has no merit whatsoever.

The central thesis of this argument is that the absence of the word "the" before "occupied territories" in that clause means not "all of the occupied territories" were intended. Essentially, this argument rests upon the ridiculous logic that because the word "the" was omitted from the clause, we may therefore understand this to mean that "some of the occupied territories" was the intended meaning.

Grammatically, the absence of the word "the" has no effect on the meaning of this clause, which refers to "territories", plural. A simple litmus test question is: Is it territory that was occupied by Israel in the '67 war? If yes, then, under international law and Resolution 242, Israel is required to withdraw from that territory. Such territories include the Syrian Golan Heights, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip.

The French version of the resolution, equally authentic as the English, contains the definite article, and a majority of the members of the Security Council made clear during deliberations that their understanding of the resolution was that it would require Israel to fully withdraw from all occupied territories.

Additionally, it is impossible to reconcile with the principle of international law cited in the preamble to the resolution, of "the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war". To say that the U.N. intended that Israel could retain some of the territory it occupied during the war would fly in the face of this cited principle.

One could go on to address various other logical fallacies associated with this frivolous argument, but as it is absurd on its face, it would be superfluous to do so.

Myth #7 – Israeli military action against its neighbors is only taken to defend itself against terrorism.
The facts tell another story. Take, for instance, the devastating 1982 Israeli war on Lebanon. As political analyst Noam Chomsky extensively documents in his epic analysis "The Fateful Triangle", this military offensive was carried out with barely even the thinnest veil of a pretext.

While one may read contemporary accounts insisting this war was fought in response to a constant shelling of northern Israeli by the PLO, then based in Lebanon, the truth is that, despite continuous Israeli provocations, the PLO had with only a few exceptions abided by a cease-fire that had been in place. Moreover, in each of those instances, it was Israel that had first violated the cease-fire.

Among the Israeli provocations, throughout early 1982, it attacked and sank Lebanese fishing boats and otherwise committed hundreds of violations of Lebanese territorial waters. It committed thousands of violations of Lebanese airspace, yet never did manage to provoke the PLO response it sought to serve as the casus belli for the planned invasion of Lebanon.

On May 9, Israel bombed Lebanon, an act that was finally met with a PLO response when it launched rocket and artillery fire into Israel.

Then a terrorist group headed by Abu Nidal attempted to assassinate Israeli Ambassador Shlomo Argov in London. Although the PLO itself had been at war with Abu Nidal, who had been condemned to death by a Fatah military tribunal in 1973, and despite the fact that Abu Nidal was not based in Lebanon, Israel cited this event as a pretext to bomb the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps, killing 200 Palestinians. The PLO responded by shelling settlements in northern Israel. Yet Israel did not manage to provoke the kind of larger-scale response it was looking to use as a casus belli for its planned invasion.

As Israeli scholar Yehoshua Porath has suggested, Israel's decision to invade Lebanon, far from being a response to PLO attacks, rather "flowed from the very fact that the cease-fire had been observed". Writing in the Israeli daily Haaretz, Porath assessed that "The government's hope is that the stricken PLO, lacking a logistic and territorial base, will return to its earlier terrorism…. In this way, the PLO will lose part of the political legitimacy that it has gained … undercutting the danger that elements will develop among the Palestinians that might become a legitimate negotiating partner for future political accommodations."

As another example, take Israel's Operation Cast Lead from December 27, 2008 to January 18, 2009. Prior to Israel's assault on the besieged and defenseless population of the Gaza Strip, Israel had entered into a cease-fire agreement with the governing authority there, Hamas. Contrary to popular myth, it was Israel, not Hamas, who ended the cease-fire.

The pretext for Operation Cast Lead is obligatorily described in Western media accounts as being the "thousands" of rockets that Hamas had been firing into Israel prior to the offensive, in violation of the cease-fire.

The truth is that from the start of the cease-fire in June until November 4, Hamas fired no rockets, despite numerous provocations from Israel, including stepped-up operations in the West Bank and Israeli soldiers taking pop-shots at Gazans across the border, resulting in several injuries and at least one death.

On November 4, it was again Israel who violated the cease-fire, with airstrikes and a ground invasion of Gaza that resulted in further deaths. Hamas finally responded with rocket fire, and from that point on the cease-fire was effectively over, with daily tit-for-tat attacks from both sides.

Despite Israel's lack of good faith, Hamas offered to renew the cease-fire from the time it was set to officially expire in December. Israel rejected the offer, preferring instead to inflict violent collective punishment on the people of Gaza.

As the Israeli Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center noted, the truce "brought relative quiet to the western Negev population", with 329 rocket and mortar attacks, "most of them during the month and a half after November 4″, when Israel had violated and effectively ended the truce. This stands in remarkable contrast to the 2,278 rocket and mortar attacks in the six months prior to the truce. Until November 4, the center also observed, "Hamas was careful to maintain the ceasefire."

If Israel had desired to continue to mitigate the threat of Palestinian militant rocket attacks, it would have simply not ended the cease-fire, which was very highly effective in reducing the number of such attacks, including eliminating all such attacks by Hamas. It would not have instead resorted to violence, predictably resulting in a greatly escalated threat of retaliatory rocket and mortar attacks from Palestinian militant groups.

Moreover, even if Israel could claim that peaceful means had been exhausted and that a resort military force to act in self-defense to defend its civilian population was necessary, that is demonstrably not what occurred. Instead, Israel deliberately targeted the civilian population of Gaza with systematic and deliberate disproportionate and indiscriminate attacks on residential areas, hospitals, schools, and other locations with protected civilian status under international law.

As the respected international jurist who headed up the United Nations investigation into the assault, Richard Goldstone, has observed, the means by which Israel carried out Operation Cast Lead were not consistent with its stated aims, but was rather more indicative of a deliberate act of collective punishment of the civilian population.
Myth #8 – God gave the land to the Jews, so the Arabs are the occupiers.
No amount of discussion of the facts on the ground will ever convince many Jews and Christians that Israel could ever do wrong, because they view its actions as having the hand of God behind it, and that its policies are in fact the will of God. They believe that God gave the land of Palestine, including the West Bank and Gaza Strip, to the Jewish people, and therefore Israel has a "right" to take it by force from the Palestinians, who, in this view, are the wrongful occupiers of the land.

But one may simply turn to the pages of their own holy books to demonstrate the fallaciousness of this or similar beliefs. Christian Zionists are fond of quoting passages from the Bible such as the following to support their Zionist beliefs:

"And Yahweh said to Abram, after Lot had separated from him: 'Lift your eyes now and look from the place where you are – northward, southward, eastward, and westward; for all the land which you see I give to you and your descendants forever. And I will make your descendants as the dust of the earth; so that if a man could number the dust of the earth, then your descendants could also be numbered. Arise, walk in the land through its length and its width, for I give it to you." (Genesis 13:14-17)
"Then Yahweh appeared to him and said: 'Do not go down to Egypt; live in the land of which I shall tell you. Dwell in the land, and I will be with you and bless you; for to you and your descendants I give all these lands, and I will perform the oath which I swore to Abraham your father." (Genesis 26: 1-3)
"And behold, Yahweh stood above it and said: 'I am Yahweh, God of Abraham your father, and the God of Isaac; the land on which you lie I will give to you and your descendants." (Genesis 28:13)

Yet Christian Zionists conveniently disregard other passages providing further context for understanding this covenant, such as the following:

"You shall therefore keep all My statutes and all My judgments, and perform them, that the land where I am bringing you to dwell may not vomit you out." (Leviticus 20:22)
"But if you do not obey Me, and do not observe all these commandments … but break My covenant … I will bring the land to desolation, and your enemies who dwell in it shall be astonished at it. I will scatter you among the nations and draw out a sword after you; your land shall be desolate and your cities waste … You shall perish among the nations, and the land of your enemies shall eat you up." (Leviticus 26: 14, 15, 32-33, 28)
"Therefore Yahweh was very angry with Israel, and removed them from His sight; there was none left but the tribe of Judah alone…. So Israel was carried away from their own land to Assyria, as it is to this day." (2 Kings 17:18, 23)
"And I said, after [Israel] had done all these things, 'Return to Me.' But she did not return. And her treacherous sister Judah saw it. Then I saw that for all the causes for which backsliding Israel had committed adultery, I had put her away and given her a certificate of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah did not fear, but went and played the harlot also." (Jeremiah 3: 7-8)

Yes, in the Bible, Yahweh, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, told the Hebrews that the land could be theirs – if they would obey his commandments. Yet, as the Bible tells the story, the Hebrews were rebellious against Yahweh in all their generations.

What Jewish and Christian Zionists omit from their Biblical arguments in favor of continued Israel occupation is that Yahweh also told the Hebrews, including the tribe of Judah (from whom the "Jews" are descended), that he would remove them from the land if they broke the covenant by rebelling against his commandments, which is precisely what occurs in the Bible.

Thus, the theological argument for Zionism is not only bunk from a secular point of view, but is also a wholesale fabrication from a scriptural perspective, representing a continued rebelliousness against Yahweh and his Torah, and the teachings of Yeshua the Messiah (Jesus the Christ) in the New Testament.

Myth #9 – Palestinians reject the two-state solution because they want to destroy Israel.
In an enormous concession to Israel, Palestinians have long accepted the two-state solution. The elected representatives of the Palestinian people in Yasser Arafat's Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) had since the 70s recognized the state of Israel and accepted the two-state solution to the conflict. Despite this, Western media continued through the 90s to report that the PLO rejected this solution and instead wanted to wipe Israel off the map.

The pattern has been repeated since Hamas was voted into power in the 2006 Palestinian elections. Although Hamas has for years accepted the reality of the state of Israel and demonstrated a willingness to accept a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip alongside Israel, it is virtually obligatory for Western mainstream media, even today, to report that Hamas rejects the two-state solution, that it instead seeks "to destroy Israel".

In fact, in early 2004, shortly before he was assassinated by Israel, Hamas founder Sheik Ahmed Yassin said that Hamas could accept a Palestinian state alongside Israel. Hamas has since repeatedly reiterated its willingness to accept a two-state solution.

In early 2005, Hamas issued a document stating its goal of seeking a Palestinian state alongside Israel and recognizing the 1967 borders.

The exiled head of the political bureau of Hamas, Khalid Mish'al, wrote in the London Guardian in January 2006 that Hamas was "ready to make a just peace".  He wrote that "We shall never recognize the right of any power to rob us of our land and deny us our national rights…. But if you are willing to accept the principle of a long-term truce, we are prepared to negotiate the terms."

During the campaigning for the 2006 elections, the top Hamas official in Gaza, Mahmoud al-Zahar said that Hamas was ready to "accept to establish our independent state on the area occupied [in] '67″, a tacit recognition of the state of Israel.

The elected prime minister from Hamas, Ismail Haniyeh, said in February 2006 that Hamas accepted "the establishment of a Palestinian state" within the "1967 borders".

In April 2008, former U.S. President Jimmy Carter met with Hamas officials and afterward stated that Hamas "would accept a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders" and would "accept the right of Israel to live as a neighbor next door in peace". It was Hamas' "ultimate goal to see Israel living in their allocated borders, the 1967 borders, and a contiguous, vital Palestinian state alongside."

That same month Hamas leader Meshal said, "We have offered a truce if Israel withdraws to the 1967 borders, a truce of 10 years as a proof of recognition."

In 2009, Meshal said that Hamas "has accepted a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders".
Hamas' shift in policy away from total rejection of the existence of the state of Israel towards acceptance of the international consensus on a two-state solution to the conflict is in no small part a reflection of the will of the Palestinian public. A public opinion survey from April of last year, for instance, found that three out of four Palestinians were willing to accept a two-state solution.

Myth #10 – The U.S. is an honest broker and has sought to bring about peace in the Middle East.
Rhetoric aside, the U.S. supports Israel's policies, including its illegal occupation and other violations of international humanitarian law. It supports Israel's criminal policies financially, militarily, and diplomatically.
The Obama administration, for example, stated publically that it was opposed to Israel's settlement policy and ostensibly "pressured" Israel to freeze colonization activities. Yet very early on, the administration announced that it would not cut back financial or military aid to Israel, even if it defied international law and continued settlement construction. That message was perfectly well understood by the Netanyahu government in Israel, which continued its colonization policies.

To cite another straightforward example, both the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate passed resolutions openly declaring support for Israel's Operation Cast Lead, despite a constant stream of reports evidencing Israeli war crimes.

On the day the U.S. Senate passed its resolution "reaffirming the United States' strong support for Israel in its battle with Hamas" (January 8, 2009), the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) issued a statement demanding that Israel allow it to assist victims of the conflict because the Israeli military had blocked access to wounded Palestinians – a war crime under international law.

That same day, U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon issued a statement condemning Israel for firing on a U.N. aid convoy delivering humanitarian supplies to Gaza and for the killing of two U.N. staff members – both further war crimes.

On the day that the House passed its own version of the resolution, the U.N. announced that it had had to stop humanitarian work in Gaza because of numerous incidents in which its staff, convoys, and installations, including clinics and schools, had come under Israeli attack.

U.S. financial support for Israel surpasses $3 billion annually. When Israel waged a war to punish the defenseless civilian population of Gaza, its pilots flew U.S.-made F-16 fighter-bombers and Apache helicopter gunships, dropping U.S.-made bombs, including the use of white phosphorus munitions in violation of international law.

U.S. diplomatic support for Israeli crimes includes its use of the veto power in the U.N. Security Council. When Israel was waging a devastating war against the civilian population and infrastructure of Lebanon in the summer of 2006, the U.S. vetoed a cease-fire resolution.

As Israel was waging Operation Cast Lead, the U.S. delayed the passage of a resolution calling for an end to the violence, and then abstained rather than criticize Israel once it finally allowed the resolution to be put to a vote.

When the U.N. Human Rights Council officially adopted the findings and recommendations of its investigation into war crimes during Operation Cast Lead, headed up by Richard Goldstone, the U.S. responded by announcing its intention to block any effort to have the Security Council similarly adopt its conclusions and recommendations. The U.S. Congress passed a resolution rejecting the Goldstone report because it found that Israel had committed war crimes.

Through its virtually unconditional support for Israel, the U.S. has effectively blocked any steps to implement the two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The so-called "peace process" has for many decades consisted of U.S. and Israeli rejection Palestinian self-determination and blocking of any viable Palestinian state.

* Jeremy R. Hammond is an independent political analyst and a recipient of the 2010 Project Censored Awards for Outstanding Investigative Journalism.

Umno's "Islam For All" Does It Equals "Allah For All"??

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:42 PM PDT

From what I know, all religions except for Islam, are opened to any one who wanted to profess them. There are no restrictions, no force applied and the doors to their religious shrines are always open to all. You are free to embrace and you are free to leave any time. No persecution nor prosecution for their actions regarding their religious belief unless their actions are against any civil laws.

In Malaysia, Islam is the most sacred religion to the muslims and non muslims are not allowed to talk about it, words from their holy koran are banned from being used by non muslim even though certain Christian groups had been using them for centuries.

Other religions are not permitted by law to preach nor spread the words of their God to muslims. For a non muslim to convert into a muslim, it is a one way street, once in it is very difficult for you to denounce it and to embrace other religion.

So, what is Umno's "Islam For All" means? The intention to voice out that Islam is for all may be good but when applied, it can deviate from its true intention. Just look at how they manipulated and twisted the constitution, the true intention of the NEP and playing politics with religions.


When "Islam For All" is put into practice, does it mean that all Malaysians will be subjected to the Islamic laws? Is Umno trying to force Malaysians to embrace Islam and turning the country into an Islamic State? There are so many question marks as to the real intention of Umno's "Islam for all" concept.

A comment on Malaysiakini is worth mentioning here,

"Keturunan Malaysia : Take religion out of Education and take religion out of Politics. No matter how much religion you put into anyone, if you still walk like a crab you still walk like a crab. Have you ever wonder why God gives you brains? No...then let me tell you...to think for yourselves! If you can't think for yourselves, how the hell are you going to think for us. AND even if you can and want to think for us, please have the courtesy to ask us first. Meanwhile, until you can think, better let us help you to think for us and you!!! For 50+ years, you have wasted our growing up life. Luckily, many of us grow up on our own but sadly you are still small runts yet to finish your childish rantings. So go through the process and start with playing marbles. When you are real adults and ready, then come to talk with us."

Does Umno's "Islam for all" means that the word "Allah" can now be used by all Malaysians? Will the government now retract their appeal against the court ruling that Christians are allowed to used the word "Allah". Does it mean that we are allowed into the mosque, talk about Islam without being a muslim?

My request to Umno is, "STOP PLAYING POLITIC WITH RELIGION", there can be no "Islam for all" in Malaysia with all the hurdles that you placed in front of the non muslims.

By Richard Loh

Boleh Menyelam 3 Meter Jer...???

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:38 PM PDT

KD Tun Razak yang dikendalikan 31 anggota krew dan berkuasa diesel itu boleh beroperasi sehingga kedalaman lebih 300 meter. 
 
Pemilikan kapal selam itu adalah sejajar dengan keperluan serta tanggungjawab yang diamanahkan kepada TLDM bagi memastikan perairan negara termasuk Zon Ekonomi Eksklusif dikawal dan dipertahankan pada setiap masa. -Berita Hairan


Perkataan yang gua hitamkan tu... yang membuatkan gua musykil sikit.... kah..kah..kah... adakah perkataan seperti gambar bawah nih....

Walau apa pun Syabas kepada Negara kerana dah mempunyai dua buah kapal selam..., yang pertama sudah terkenal sebagai kapal tak boleh menyelam, yang kedua pulak katanya boleh menyelam sedalam 3 meter jer... ooppssss maaf 300 meter... harap2 betul lah tu... jangan jadi seperti gambar hantu tu.... yang tergantung-gantung di awangan... nak kata selam tak menyelam... nak kata timbul pun tidak juga... sebab apa ekkk...???
  IkutSukaAku.

Bala ke Perancis untuk beri keterangan...MACC buru wakil rakyat PKR!!

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:34 PM PDT


Ada kes yang agak2 ada kaitan dengan syarikat asing....baik bebenolah report kat negara2 tersebut. Kalau report kat Malaysia alamat jadi pekasam aje...

French prosecutors to interview PI Bala over submarine deal

(Free Malaysia Today) KUALA LUMPUR: French prosecutors will be interviewing private investigator P Balasubramaniam in Paris next week as part of their ongoing investigation into claims of corruption over a US$1.1 billion submarine deal linked to Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak.
Balasubramaniam's lawyer Americk Singh Sidhu told FMT that he was informed by French lawyers of this latest development yesterday.
"Balasubramaniam will be travelling to Paris later next week to talk to the French prosecutors," he said.
He added that it was an irony that the French prosecutors were ready to talk to Balasubramaniam but not the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officers.
He was referrring to the MACC's decision yesterday not to send its officers to London to record statements from Balasubramaniam in the murder trial of Mongolian Altantuya Shariibuu.
MACC deputy chief commissioner (operations) Mohd Shukri Abdull had said Balasubramaniam would instead be asked to answer questions which would be submitted through his lawyer in the form of a sworn statement or affidavit, as advised by the Attorney-General.
Americk said he was disappointed with the MACC's decision not to fly out to London to meet Balasubramaniam as was previously agreed upon.
"I just find it interesting that the French don't seem to have a problem in taking Balasubramaniam's statement unlike our MACC and its legal advisers," he said.
"We will, however, continue with our plan in London. We have arranged for a press conference on July 7 and that will proceed," he added.

KD ALTANTUYA II - Selamat Tiba Di Perairan Negara

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:31 PM PDT

KUALA LUMPUR, 1 Julai (Bernama) -- Kapal selam kedua negara, KD Tun Razak tiba di perairan negara pada Khamis dari limbungan pembinaannya di Madrid, Sepanyol.

Kapal selam jenis Scorpene yang dilancarkan oleh Raja Permaisuri Agong Tuanku Nur Zahirah pada 8 Okt 2008 itu kini dalam perjalanan ke Pangkalan Tentera Laut Diraja Malaysia (TLDM) Lumut untuk sambutan rasminya pada Jumaat.

Menurut kenyataan TLDM, sambutan rasmi pada sebelah petang akan diserikan dengan keberangkatan Sultan Perak Sultan Azlan Shah dan Sultan Selangor Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah.

Turut menyambut ketibaan kapal itu ialah Menteri Pertahanan Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi dan Panglima Angkatan Tentera Jen Tan Sri Azizan Ariffin.

KD Tun Razak dinamakan bersempena Perdana Menteri kedua Malaysia Tun Abdul Razak Hussein sebagai mengenang jasa negarawan ulung itu atas sumbangannya kepada kemerdekaan, permodenan, pentadbiran dan pembangunan negara.

KD Tun Razak yang dikendalikan oleh 31 anggota krew bergerak dengan tenaga diesel dan boleh beroperasi sehingga kedalaman lebih 300 meter.

Pemilikan kapal selam itu adalah sejajar dengan keperluan serta tanggungjawab yang diamanahkan kepada TLDM bagi memastikan perairan negara termasuk Zon Ekonomi Eksklusif dikawal dan dipertahankan pada setiap masa.

-- BERNAMA

Said Zahari: KDN Menangguk Di Air Keruh..

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:29 PM PDT

Tokoh wartawan, Said Zahari menyelar tindakan Kementerian Dalam Negeri (KDN) yang dilihat cuba menangguk di air keruh apabila mencampur-aduk isu yang melibatkan masalah Felda dengan isu permit akhbar Suara Keadilan.

"Kenapa KDN campur tangan ini? Soal KDN ialah soal permit. Pada pandangan saya soal permit tidak timbul lagi. Soal sekarang, apakah tulisan dalam Suara Keadilan itu tidak betul atau fitnah yang mungkin merosakkan nama baik Felda.

"Kalau itu yang felda rasakan, Felda boleh ambil tindakan," katanya kepada TV Selangor yang menganggap agensi itu boleh mengambil tindakan perundangan tetapi KDN tidak wajar mengambil tindakan bagi pihak agensi berkenaan.

Anehnya, ketika isu Felda sedang hangat, KDN pula membangkitkan status permit Suara Keadilan akan yang diproses pada mesyuarat panel 13 anggota jawatankuasa mengkaji dan menilai permohonan permit penerbitan media cetak.

"Soal KDN itu soal kedua. Kalau Suara Keadilan buat berita yang dianggap memfitnah, soal KDN tarik balik atau tidak, tidak timbul," katanya lagi.

Negeri Ada Hak Lantik Penasihat Undang-undang - Zaid ..Nazri yang sontot..!!!

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:26 PM PDT


Oleh ARIFFUDDIN ISHAK
KUALA LUMPUR: Ahli Majlis Pimpinan Pusat Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), Datuk Zaid Ibrahim membidas kenyataan Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Abdul Aziz bahawa kerajaan negeri yang dikuasai pembangkang tidak boleh melantik penasihat undang-undangnya sendiri.
Menurutnya, kerajaan negeri mempunyai kuasa yang diperuntukan di bawah undang-undang tubuh negeri bagi melantik penasihat undang-undang.
"Dalam perlembagaan (negeri) Menteri Besar atau Ketua Menteri ada hak untuk memilih (penasihat undang-undang).
"Ia terpulang kepada negeri itu sendiri, seperti di Kelantan, mereka ada perundangan mereka sendiri," katanya ketika ditemui selepas majlis penyerahan tugas sebagai Pengerusi Majlis Pimpinan Negeri Wilayah Persekutuan yang baru di sini malam ini.
Beliau berkata demikian sebagai mengulas kenyataan Mohamed Nazri di Parlimen hari ini bahawa tindakan melantik penasihat undang-undang sendiri adalah tidak mengikut perlembagaan.
Jelasnya pelantikan penasihat undang-undang negeri hanya boleh dibuat oleh Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Kehakiman dan Perundangan.
Sebelum ini akhbar melaporkan Ketua Pembangkang, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim berkata, pelantikan penasihat undang-undang negeri akan dilakukan sendiri oleh kerajaan negeri dikuasai pembangkang.
Bagaimanapun Zaid berkata, isu perlantikan penasihat undang-undang negeri ini hanya melibatkan soal perundangan dan boleh dilakukan perbincangan mengenai pelaksanaannya.
"Pada saya ia soal perundangan, kita boleh selesai secara perbincangan.
"Mungkin benar kita perlu dapatkan juga peguam daripada Pejabat Peguam Negara, tapi kita (mahu supaya) boleh pilih sendiri (peguam) dan bukannya dipilih oleh Peguam Negara... perkara macam inilah yang perlu dibincang," katanya.

Kita tunggu apa jadi kepada ulama muda..he.he..!!! Kita lihat sape yang kena...

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:25 PM PDT

Mohd Hosni Mubarak   
Di sini saya menegaskan yang mana saya menafikan dakwaan oleh Datuk Seri Shahidan Kasim, Fathul Bari dan Fadlan yang saya tidak diundang. Memang saya diraikan bersama-sama ulama yang lain, yang dikatakan 40 orang masuk Umno. Tak ada dibagitau sebelum itu majlis khas serah borang Umno jangan masuk, dan akhirnya saya dibenarkan masuk kerana dakwaannya saya beria-ria nak bersalam dengan PM, kata Shahidan. Saya menegaskan dakwaan Datuk Seri Shahidan itu tipu.
Dalam pengetahuan saya, yang mana hebat diperkatakan oleh media arus perdana sejumlah  40 ulama muda masuk Umno saya minta kepada Fathul Bari dan Fadlan buktikan, benar atau tidak sejumlah 40 ulama muda masuk Umno malam hari tu. Saya rasa tak cukup pun 40 orang, dalam anggaran 20 orang lebih je. Tapi kenapa dicanang dalam media 40 orang. Kalau tak termasuk saya dan kawan-kawan saya, kenapa kami disuruh berbaris dan bersalam dengan PM Datuk Seri Najib dan terus diumumkan, inilah dia barisan ulama muda masuk Umno.
Saya minta dan mengharap sahabat-sahabat barisan ulama yang lain kalau rasa dirinya tertipu dan teraniaya mari sama-sama bersama saya. Kita tunjukkan dan tegaskan pendirian kita mana golongan ulama, bukan golongan yang boleh dipermain-main dan dikotak katikkan oleh Umno dan Barisan Nasional.
Dari angka 100 turun 40. Itulah bilangan ulama yang menyertai Umno Jumaat lalu . Tak mengapalah bilangannya kurang 60 tetapi hakikatnya memang ada ulamak yang masuk Umno Jumaat lalu.
Menurut akhbar Utusan:
Wakil kumpulan ulama, Dr. Fadlan Mohd. Othman, 35, berkata, penyertaan mereka bertujuan untuk bekerjasama dengan parti itu dalam perkara yang berkaitan keagamaan dan kerohanian.
Baguslah jika itu niat mereka. Siapa pun tidak berhak menyekat mana-mana individu memilih dan menyertai mana-mana parti politik. Dengan penyertaan mereka ini ternyata aspek keagamaan dan kerohanian tandus dalam Umno, maklumlah Umno bukan sebuah badan siasah yang meletakkan Islam sebagai agenda perjuangannya.
Yang terbukti sampai hari ini mempertahankan agenda perjuangan Islam adalah PAS. Sama ada dalam keadaan menang atau tidak memerintah satu negeri pun itulah dasar dan matlamat perjuangan PAS dari dahulu sehingga hari ini dan insya Allah sampai bila-bila. Saya akui saya belum mengisi borang ahli PAS disebabkan saya belajar dan masih menumpukan pengajian dan menyambung peringkat master tetapi saya tahu matlamat dan perjuangan PAS.
Mengapa mereka tidak menyertai PAS?
Salah seorang jurucakap itu mengatakan PAS dah ramai ulama. Bagi saya mungkin Umno nampak lebih gagah, punya kuasa besar, memegang tampuk pemerintahan peringkat pusat. Maka sudah pastilah mengambil kira perhitungan dunia, Umno lah pilihan terbijak tambah kebanyakan mereka punya jawatan dalam kerajaan. Sekurang-kurangnya masa depan mereka terjamin. Anak-anak mereka nanti mudah nak dapat bantuan. Keluarga mereka juga. Mengapa mengambil jalan susah, megapa mahu pikul risiko,mengapa cari nahas?
Rasulullah s.a.w. ditawarkan menjadi raja, ditawarkan kedudukan, isteri yang cantik-cantik, hidup senang dan mewah, tetapi Rasulullah memilih untuk terus menerajui perjuangan ini kerana mengharapkan redha Allah swt.
Saya memetik ucapan Datuk Seri Tuan Guru Abdul Hadi Awang yang dibukukan dalam: Islam – Fikrah, Harakah dan Daulah, lebih 30 tahun lalu sempena Sambutan Abad ke 15 Hijrah di Kuala Terengganu:
Sebab Rasulullah s.a.w. menolak semua tawaran itu ialah yang pertama kerana golongan-golongan jahiliyah yang dipimpin oleh Abu Jahal itu mensyaratkan Rasulullah s.a.w. iaitu:
Wahai Muhammad awak boleh menerima jawatan menjadi raja. Awak boleh menerima harta. Awak boleh menerima pangkat. Syaratnya awak hendaklah mendiamkan diri terhadap kemungkaran, jahiliyah, kekufuran yang berlaku di Makkah ini. Awak nak sembahyang, bersembahyanglah. Nak berpuasa, puasalah. Nak tawaf di Kaabah, tawaflah. Nak mengerjakan haji, kerjakanlah haji. Tapi kami minum arak jangan ganggu. Kami berjudi jangan ganggu. Kami menyembah berhala jangan ganggu. Kami melakukan kufur dan jahiliyah jangan ganggu.
 Semoga banyak perkara berkaitan keagamaan dan kerohanian dapat diterapkan dalam Umno melalui penyertaan kawan-kawan kita itu. Kita ucapkan kepada Fathul Bari dan Fadlan selamat mencuba dan semoga berjaya dalam Umno. Ramai ahli dan penyokong PAS mencabar ulama muda yang menyertai Umno supaya menghapuskan budaya rasuah/politik wang, budaya berjuang untuk projek, budaya untuk kepentingan diri sendiri yang sudah menjadi darah daging dalam Umno selama ini.
Selain itu mereka juga mahukan ulama muda mengubah perlembagaan Umno dan dasar perjuangan Umno dari nasionalis dan pragmatis kepada dasar Islam. Dan juga jangan lupa, ulama muda mesti dapat mengubah seluruh pemimpin Umno supaya komited dengan tuntutan agama khususnya bab menutup aurat dan akhlaq.
Seperti kemasukan ulama-ulama sebelum ini seperti Datuk Pirdaus, Imam Besar Masjid Negara, mana menghilang sekarang ini saya tak tau? Tuan-tuan tahu ke mana dia pergi? Yusof Nor, Hamid Othman, Nakhaie Ahmad, Hamid Zainal Abidin, Abdullah Md Zin, Mashitah, Jamil Khir dan lain-lain mereka hanya duduk dalam Umno/Barisan Nasional (BN) dan tidak boleh hendak berbuat apa.
Kalau ulama dan ustaz yang terkenal tidak mampu mempengaruhi sebarang keputusan yang diambil oleh kerajaan di semua peringkat macam mana dengan ulama muda 40 orang ni. Mampukah mereka mengubah Umno/BN? Kita tunggu dan lihat apa akan jadi dengan Fathul Bari dan Fadhlan.

257 ribu anak tidak sah taraf di Malaysia..mereka ni bakal pengundi TETAP UMNO@APCO...!!!

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:21 PM PDT

By albanjari 
Punca utama yang mendatangkan gejala sosial adalah globalisasi dan modenasasi. Perubahan-perubahan pantas tahap nasional berlaku kerana perubahan pada arus global yang digelar globalisasi.

Globalisasi tidak saja ditandai dengan dominasi ekonomi tetapi ia merentasi ke arah budaya dan pemikiran. Pembudayaan kota (city culture) menuruti landasan Barat berlaku dengan lebih pantas dan agresif dengan adanya teknologi maklumat dan multi media sebagai kenderaan yang amat berkesan untuk melakukan agenda globalisasi. Lazimnya, kita sebagai manusia mempunyai sifat ingin tahu terhadap perkara baru dan trendy, yakni bukan dari budaya ketimuran

Contohnya seperti mewarnakan rambut, memakai anting-anting atau tattoo bahkan sampai kepada hal-hal yang sangat teruk seperti pengambilan minuman keras dan pergaulan bebas yang boleh menjurus kepada masalah gejala sosial yang lebih serius. Bentuk dan Pengaruh Manifestasi Globalisasi & Modenisasi yang membawa kepada gejala sosial di dalam masyarakat.

• Media Massa
Pengaruh modenisasi dan globalisasi in lebih terasa dan ketara dengan bantuan berbagai alat media-massa yang serba canggih. Media massa merupakan sumber maklumat yg cukup berkesan dalam penyebaran berbagai informasi. Melalui teknologi yang semakin canggih ini, golongan belia mudah terdedah kepada banyak maklumat, namun tidak semua maklumat- maklumat itu sesuai untuk kesemua peringkat umur.

Ini menjadi masalah kerana lazimnya golongan belia mudah meniru dan mengikut hal yang dilihat di sekeliling mereka. Paparan adegan-adegan negatif dari filem barat menimbulkan perasaan ingin tahu dan ingin cuba sendiri mengikut apa yang ditonton.

• Internet
Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (ICT) juga turut menyumbang kepada pemaparan gejala-gejala negatif selain peranannya yang begitu penting bagi kemajuan sesebuah bangsa dan negara. Melalui internet umpamanya, masyarakat yang berfikiran kurang sehat dengan mudahnya boleh akses kepada maklumat-maklumat yang boleh menjurus ke arah pemikiran negatif.

• Institusi Kekeluargaan Yang Pincang
Institusi kekeluargaan yang bermasalah juga boleh menimbulkan gejala sosial. Ibu bapa seharusnya menerap dan mendidik anak-anak mereka dari kecil. Sekiranya, ibu bapa bersikap sambil lewa terhadap pendidikan agama anak-anak mereka, ini akan menjadi satu faktor punca gejala sosial. Dan lagi, dengan bertambahnya komitmen ibu bapa terhadap kerjaya mereka, masa diluangkan untuk keluarga itu terhad.

Ini akan membuat anak - anak kurang mendapat kasih sayang dan tidak mustahil mereka akan mencari alternatif lain untuk mengisi kegersangan kasih sayang. Selain daripada itu, rumahtangga yang bermasalah juga, seperti perceraian dan pergaduhan turut mempengaruhi remaja untuk terlibat dalam aktiviti-aktiviti yang tidak sihat.

• Cara Berpakaian
Jika kita perhatikan pakaian sesetengah golongan muda di masa ini cukup memalukan. Cara berpakaian mereka bertentangan dengan cara pakaian budaya melayu sekali gus bertentangan dengan cara pemakaian yang digariskan Islam, agama rasmi negara kita. Mereka begitu ghairah untuk mengikut budaya asing yang dianggap moden dan maju.

Mereka takut dan terlalu ego untuk dikatakan ketinggalan zaman, kuno, dan berfikiran sempit. Sayangnya, tidak semua dapat menerima pendapat bahawa mereka ada memainkan peranan dalam melonjaknya jumlah kes rogol dan seks bebas. Firman Allah s.w.t:
_
"Wahai Nabi! Katakanlah kepada isteri-isterimu, anak-anak perempuanmu serta perempuan-perempuan yang beriman, supaya mereka melabuhkan pakaiannya bagi menutup seluruh tubuhnya (semasa mereka keluar),c ara itu lebih sesuai untuk mereka dikenal (sebagai perempuan yang baik-baik),dengan itu mereka tidak diganggu, dan ingatlah Allah amat pengampun lagi amat mengasihani". Al-Ahzab : Ayat 59

• Dunia Cinta Remaja
Di zaman moden ini, pergaulan bebas antara lelaki dan perempuan yang bukan mahram telah dilihat sebagai satu kemajuan dalam pembentukan masyarakat yang lebih maju tetapi bukan sebagai pelanggaran perintah Allah SWT. Memang lumrah, perasaan ingin berpasangan semakin memuncak ketika berada di alam remaja.

Tetapi sekiranya perasaan ini tidak dikawal, sudah tentu ini akan menimbulkan gejala - gejala sosial seperti pergaulan bebas, anak luar nikah, zina dan sebagainya. Bercinta tidak pernah dianggap salah malahan orang yang tidak percaya akan cinta kepada insan lain dan pencipta-Nya merupakan golongan manusia yang rugi.

Islam sendiri menggalakkan umatnya saling kenal mengenali antara satu sama lain tanpa mengira jantina, bangsa dan agama. Mungkin ada cara untuk menangani masalah percintaan. Remaja diingatkan supaya berkawan atau bercinta dengan cara yang telah digariskan oleh Islam yang diantaranya adalah mengelakkan pergaulan tanpa batas, berdua-duaan di tempat sunyi dan sebagainya.

• Terlalu Banyak Masa Lapang
Sekiranya masa lapang golongan remaja terbatas, mereka akan rasa kurang berminat pada kegiatan-kegiatan yang tidak berfaedah. Pengisian masa lapang yang kurang terarah, akan mendesak remaja untuk melakukan aktiviti yang tidak bermanfaat seperti perbuatan negatif.

KESAN GEJALA SOSIAL KEPADA MASYARAKAT
Semua ini membawakan kesan – kesan negatif pada budaya dan cara hidup kita. Struktur kehidupan sosial masyarakat banyak berubah. Budaya moden telah mempengaruhi 'persepsi fikiran dan tingkah laku', cara berfikir termasuk penghayatan terhadap ajaran agama.

Muda-mudi bergaul bebas, tidak menghiraukan batas-batas ajaran agama, tatasusila dan nilai-nilai murni ketimuran. Begitu juga dari segi pakaian. Gaya hidup moden juga menjadikan sebilangan masyarakat bersikap individualistik, mengabaikan sikap kekeluargaan, kejiranan dan bermasyarakat. Kebanyakan masyarakat ketika ini juga bersikap 'materialistik' untuk mengejar kemewahan dan kesenangan hidup. Dan kesannya, seperti yang dititahkan oleh Raja Muda Perak, kelmarin,
"..Nyatalah masalah anak luar nikah makin meningkat. Lebih mendukacitakan, perlakuan meninggalkan bayi baru lahir termasuk di tepi-tepi jalan dan di dalam tong sampah semakin menjadi-jadi.." Raja Nazrin Shah

Muhyiddin Pakar Fitnah No 1

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:19 PM PDT


Muhyiddin penipu besar. Lembab. Sedih tengok pencacai yahudi dalam negara ini. Muhyiddin hari ni kata Anwar tanpa segan silu ke negara itu untuk memohon maaf di atas kesilapan beliau kerana khuatir ia mungkin akan menimbulkan rasa tidak puas hati di kalangan rakan-rakannya itu.
Kunjungan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim ke Washington bagi menjernihkan hubungan dengan beberapa tokoh Yahudi di sana baru-baru ini jelas membuktikan bahawa hubungan Penasihat Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) itu dengan kumpulan tersebut memang intim, kata Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.
Memang munafik, penipu besar. Sedangkan Anwar kata kunjungannya ke Washington adalah di atas jemputan Woodrow Wilson International Center untuk memberikan syarahan. Selepas itu, katanya seperti biasa diadakan perjumpaan yang telah diatur untuk kakitangan editorial dan media antarabangsa. Sebab itulah laporan akhbar Washington Post yang ditulis yahudi, menyebut tentang ini. Bukannya Anwar terhegeh-hegeh ke sana naik kapal terbang 15 jam nak pergi semata-mata ampu yahudi. Takde masa Anwar buat macam tu sebab dia ke sana diundang untuk beri syarahan.
UMNO biasalah sebab dimana-mana pun mereka mengampu yahudi. Memang muhyiddin kaki penipu. Mulut busuk pemfitnah no 1. Tentu Anwar lepas ni akan failkan saman pada TPM yang lemah ni. Asyik-asyik nak tukar dasar pendidikan supaya namanya dikenang sebagai Penyata Muhyiddin, sama seperti Penyata Rahman Talib dan Penyata Razak. Sedangkan pelajar dan guru hidup dalam cacamarba. Kepada Muhyiddin penipu, sebelum bercakap tu eloklah siasat dulu. Bukannya baca Utusan yang bersuara macam yahudi tu. Mungkin Apco dah bagi taklimat pada kabinet suruh fitnah Anwar. Memang dahsyat pengaruh UPCO. Buat Pemimpin PR, jadikan agenda lawan APCO sebagai agenda utama. Lebih elok demontrasi esok bantah judi disertakan juga agenda bantah Apco.

CERITA HANTU BERTAMBAH SERAM...EEEE TAKUTNYA..!!!

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:19 PM PDT


TUNGGU DAN NANTI APA YANG AKAN BERLAKU DI PARIS

BALA : " YA SAYA HIDUP KERANA DAPAT DANA TAPI….." – minsider

Detektif persendirian P. Balasubramaniam yang kini berada di luar negara mengakui "menerima pembiayaan" daripada seorang tetapi orang yang dimaksudkan bukannya mereka yang rapat dengan Pakatan Rakyat, tetapi ahli perniagaan permaidani yang dikenali sebagai Deepak Jaikishan.

Balasubramaniam yang semalam berhadapan dengan situasi enggan ditemui oleh Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) di London minggu depan atas faktor implikasi perundangan berkata, dia bersetuju dengan pandangan Zahrain Hashim dalam hal tersebut.

Bagaimanapun, dalam jawapan yang dihantar menerusi peguamnya Americk Sidhu beliau berkata, sumber kewangannya bukan daripada orang lain tetapi "dana" diterima ahli perniagaan.

"Saya merujuk kepada kenyataan Zahrain Hashim (semalam).

"Saya diarahkan oleh pelanggan saya untuk mengatakan bahawa dia menyokong penuh cadangan dibuat Datuk Zahrain atas alasan mudah yang mana wang yang digunakan untuk membayar perjalanan ke London dan penginapan adalah diperoleh daripada dana diterima daripada Deepak Jaikishan," katanya.

Selepas portal-portal tempatan menyiarkan temu bual terbaru Balasubramaniam akhir tahun lalu beberapa pemimpin atasan Pemuda Pakatan Rakyat menyerahkan laporan kepada SPRM dengan menamakan Mohamed Nazim Razak dan Deepak sebagai dua individu utama yang perlu disiasat.


KENYAATAN PEGUAM BALA

I refer to the statement made by Independent MP Datuk Zahrain Mohamed Hashim in the lobby of Parliament this evening and reported in The Star online portal.

In this statement Datuk Zahrain has suggested that the "individual involved in sponsoring Bala in London" be investigated by the MACC.

I have instructions from my client to say that he fully supports the suggestion made by Datuk Zahrain for the simple reason the money he is using to pay for his trip to London and his hotel accommodation there is derived from the funds he has received from Deepak Jaikishan at the behest of Rosmah Mansor, who ultimately and unwittingly, is his sponsor.

Americk Sidhu
Counsel for P. Balasubramaniam



FRENCH PROSECUTORS TO INTERVIEW PI BALA OVER SUBMARINE – free malaysia today

French prosecutors will be interviewing private investigator P Balasubramaniam in Paris next week as part of their ongoing investigation into claims of corruption over a US$1.1 billion submarine deal linked to Najib Razak.

Balasubramaniam's lawyer Americk Singh Sidhu told FMT that he was informed by French lawyers of this latest development yesterday.

"Balasubramaniam will be travelling to Paris later next week to talk to the French prosecutors," he said.

He added that it was an irony that the French prosecutors were ready to talk to Balasubramaniam but not the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officers.
He was referrring to the MACC's decision yesterday not to send its officers to London to record statements from Balasubramaniam in the murder trial of Mongolian Altantuya Shariibuu.

MACC deputy chief commissioner (operations) Mohd Shukri Abdull had said Balasubramaniam would instead be asked to answer questions which would be submitted through his lawyer in the form of a sworn statement or affidavit, as advised by the Attorney-General.

Americk said he was disappointed with the MACC's decision not to fly out to London to meet Balasubramaniam as was previously agreed upon.

"I just find it interesting that the French don't seem to have a problem in taking Balasubramaniam's statement unlike our MACC and its legal advisers," he said.


KES PEMBUNUHAN ALTANTUYA TIDAK AKAN SELESAI

Amat jelas kes pembunuhan Atantuya dan pembelian kapal selam dari Peranchis ini tidak akan selesai.

Kes ini akan terus berpanjangan selagi Najib dan Rosmah cuba memainkan peranan dalam negara ini. Seluruh rakyat Malaysia semakin jelak melihat perangai Najib and Rosmah.

Najib dan Rosmah boleh menggunakan jentera daulah – polis, Sprm, media, lembaga kehakiman untuk melindungi mereka. Tetapi kes pembunuhan Altantuya dan kes jual beli kapal selam ini bukan lagi hanya kes pembunuhan di Malaysia. Kes ini telah pergi ke Eropah. Pada ketika ini siasatan kes ini sedang berjalan di Peranchis.

Apabila PI Bala berada di Eropah minggu hadapan – dia bukan sahaja akan mengadakan sidang media di London. Bala juga akan disoal siasat oleh pihak pendakwa Peranchis. Polis dan mahkamah Peranchis di Paris sedang menjalankan sisatan keatas penjualan dua buah kapal selam. Polis dan mahkamah Peranchis sedang menyiasat sama ada berlaku rasuah ketika jual beli kapal selam ini.

Polis dan mahkamah Peranchis menyiasat kerana syarikat yang menjual kapal selam ini ialah syarikat negara. Ertinya semua rakyat Peranchis ingin tahu 500 juta yang diberi kepada Razak Baginda itu duit berpunca dari mana.

Inilah indahnya globalisasi. Penyamun dan pengganas, pembunuh dan penipu dari Malaysia kini boleh ditangkap dan dicarakan di Eropah. 
TT.

Tak perlu?? Banyak lu punya cantik!!

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:17 PM PDT

Semalam, kata Pandikar Amin, Speaker Dewan Rakyat... SPRM sedang menjalankan penyiasatan ke atas pembelian kapal selam Scorpene yang enggan menyelam. Eh... eh... entah-entah Scorpene tu udah kena pukau oleh hantu Altantunya kot?? Sebab tu.... ia enggan menyelam...

Hari ini pulak.... Menteri Pertahanan 1Malaysia pulak kata, SPRM tak perlu menyiasat kes Scorpene, sebab.... pembeliannya mengikut prosidur. Pulak... Kalau ikut prosidur, mengapa Pandikar Amin kata, SPRM sedang menyiasat. Kalau ikut prosidur, Zahid tak perlu gusar. Biar SPRM siasat. Ini tidak.... sorang kata sedang siasat, sorang lagi kata tak perlu siasat!! Woit....!! Mana satu boleh pakai ni??

Rasa-rasanya.... dua-dua pembohong. Yang betul-betul menyiasat ialah pihak peguam negara dari Perancis. Mereka serius.... sebab tu sampai sanggup datang ke Malaysia untuk dapatkan maklumat. SPRM pulak, on the other hand.... apa buat?? Senyap.... tak ada khabar berita pun.

Zahid... Zahid.... Mamat ini pun satu hal... Apa la korang nak takut sangat, kalau tak ada hanky-panky dan betul-betul telus, mengapa mesti takut disiasat oleh SPRM? After all, yang nak menyiasat korang ialah SPRM jer.... member korang juga. Not to worrylah.... I help you, you help me, kan??

Jangan risau... kalau tak salah, biarkan saja SPRM siasat. Biar SPRM bersihkan nama korang, once and for all. Peliknya.... mengapa takut sangat kena siasat dengan SPRM??

Ingat weh.... Berani kerana benar, takut kerana salah!! Sekarang.... korang takut disiasat kan?? Persepsi orang.... korang ada benda yang nak disembunyikan dan ada pihak yang nak korang lindungi.

Sekian terima kasih.

Sumber: Baca sini dan sini
 
by A Mum Of Three Mohd

Federalisme Yang Berat Sebelah

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:15 PM PDT

Kenyataan media YB V.Sivakumar, Ahli Dewan Negeri Kawasan Tronoh pada 1 Julai 2010

Federalisme Yang Berat Sebelah

Malaysia mengamalkan pemerintahan demokrasi yang bercorak federalisme yang berat sebelah. Ini merupakan satu lagi kecacatan yang amat ketara dalam Perlembagaan Pesekutuan. Autonomi yang luas diberikan kepada kerajaan persekutuan manakala kerajaan negeri pula dicekik dalam ruangan yang sempit. Ketidak seimbangan kuasa antara kerajaan pusat dan kerajaan negeri ini menjadikan politik Malaysia kucar-kacir dan tidak tentu hala.

Kerajaan pusat menggunakan segala kuasa yang diberikan oleh Perlembagaan Persekutuan dan undang-undang lain untuk terus menindas kerajaan negeri. Kerajaan-kerajaan negeri yang berada di bawah Pakatan Rakyat menghadapi ancaman yang hebat dan bertubi-tubi. Kerajaan Pusat menggunakan kekuasaan yang ada padanya untuk membuli kerajaan negeri yang serba kekurangan dan tidak dilindungi oleh undang-undang sepenuhnya.

Kerajaan Pusat menempatkan tiga orang Ex-Officio di dalam Majlis Mesyuarat Kerajaan Negeri. Mereka ini terdiri daripada Setiausaha Kerajaan Negeri, Penasihat Undang-undang Negeri dan Pegawai Kewangan Negeri. . Ketiga-tiga pegawai utama ini adalah lantikan persekutuan. Walaupun gaji mereka ini dibayar oleh kerajaan negeri, tetapi kesetian mereka adalah tertumpu kepada kerajaan pusat yang mengawal sepenuhnya jawatan dan insentif yang lain. Ketiga-tiga pegawai ini berkhidmat sebagai tali barut kerajaan pusat di setiap negeri.

Ex-Officio ini akan menyalurkan semua maklumat-maklumat kerajaan negeri kepada Kerajaan Pusat. Dalam kata lain, kerajaan negeri tidak dapat berfungsi secara bebas. Segala tindak-tanduk dan rancangan kerajaan negeri boleh disalurkan oleh ex-officio in kepada kerajaan pusat yang cuba merisik maklumat- maklumat ini untuk kepentingan politiknya.

Ini bermakna, semua rahsia-rahsia kerajaan negeri akan diketahui oleh kerajaan pusat. Maklumat-maklumat atau keputusan-keputusan yang dibuat dalam Maljis Mesyuarat Kerajaan Negeri akan sampai kepada pengetahuan kerajaan pusat dalam sekelip mata. Kerajaan negeri pula terpaksa beroperasi dalam keadaan yang cukup bahaya dan ketakutan kerana ada musuh dalam selimut.

Federalisme seperti ini tidak menjamin demokrasi yang tulen. Pengubahssuaian kepada sistem federalisme kita harus dikaji semula dan diperbaiki. Kerajaan negeri seharusnya diberi autonomi yang cukup untuk mentadbir negeri dengan baik dan tidak dikawal dan diancam oleh kerajaan pusat.

Saya amat bersetuju dengan pandangan Profesor Aziz Bari, Pensyarah undang-undang Universiti Islam Antarabangsa yang menyarankan supaya kerajaan Pakatan Rakyat menggantikan Setiausaha Kerajaan Negeri, Penasihat Undang-undang Negeri dan Pegawai Kewangan Negeri dengan memilih orang-orang yang taat kepada kerajaan negeri dan bukannya tali barut kerajaan pusat. Cadangan ini mempunyai nas kerana ketiga-tiga pegawai kerajaan tertinggi ini boleh menggunakan kuasa yang ada pada mereka untuk melumpuhkan sesebuah kerajaan negeri.

Sebagai contoh, penglibatan dan komitmen yang diberikan oleh Setiausaha Kerajaan Negeri Perak dan Penasihat Undang-undang Negeri Perak kepada Barisan Nasional Perak dan kerajaan pusat merupakan punca kejatuhan kerajaan Pakatan Rakyat di Negeri Perak. Kerajaan Pusat menggunakan ex-officio ini untuk merancang satu konspirasi politik menumbangkan kerajaan Pakatan Rakyat di Negeri Perak. Peranan Ex-Officio ini digunakan sepenuhnya oleh kerajaan pusat untuk mendapatkan maklumat dalaman dan melemahkan kestabilan kerajaan negeriPenglibatan Ex-Officio dalam menggulingkan kerajaan Perak yang diberi mandat oleh rakyat tidak dapat dinafikan.

Oleh yang demikian, kerajaan negeri di bawah Pakatan Rakyat seharusnya menggunakan kemelut negeri Perak sebagai satu pedoman dan mengambil segala langkah berjaga-jaga dan mengantikan orang-orang yang bekerja sebagai tali barut kerajaan pusat. Kerajaan –kerajaan negeri di bawah Pakatan Rakyat tidak boleh khilaf sekali lagi dan perlu memberi perhatian yang serius dalam hal ini. Adalah mudah untuk mentadbir negeri dan melaksanakan polisi-polisi Pakatan Rakyat jika Ex-Officio yang dilantik ini adalah tediri daripada pihak yang neutral. Mereka ini seharusnya memahami konsep neutraliti dan berpegang kepada prinsip tersebut dan tidak mengikut telunjuk dan meringkuk kepada arahan kerajaan pusat .

AG Dah Negotiate Baik Punya... Enjin F-5E... kah..kah..kah...

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:14 PM PDT

Lanjutan dari berita The Star, memetik bahawa enjin jet F-5E telah di bawa pulang ke Malaysia tanpa sebarang gantirugi atau pembayaran di buat. Apa-apa sajalah cakap Menteri Malaysia nih.... ntah yea.. ntah tidak... ha..ha..ha... wapuchitau... wa pun tak tau maaaa....

Siang tadi gua melepak kat lobi satu hotel di KL... dengan somebody... somebody..., mamat nih bagitau yang enjin tu sebenarnya di keluarkan dari Malaysia oleh top-top people... connection G to G jugaklah... yang kena tangkap tu... kambing hitam jer....

Perjalanan enjin tu memang jauh dan terpaksa melalui Uruguay, yang sebenarnya enjin tersebut di bawa balik dari Iran. Kerana Iran kena sekatan ekonomi dan Iran juga mempunyai banyak pesawat juang F-5E. Lepas tu mamat tu tanya gua...

"Isa... kalau negara lu kena sekatan ekonomi... macam mana lu nak dapatkan sparepart untuk kenderaan lu... mesti dengan cara pasaran gelap atau seludup kan...???"

Gua tak jawap... tapi gua dapat tangkap maksudnya, persoalannya adakah Iran beli dari Malaysia melalui jalan belakang dan isshhhh... susah nak cakap kat dalam blog ni la.... nanti si auw..auw... ajak gua dating pulak.... kat Taman Kemunting...


Tapi lu orang cuba2 lah risik sana sinun cerita nih... kalau sesiapa yang ada maklumat lebih jangan lupa email kat gua... ha..ha..ha....

Dan lagi sedikit tambahan garam dan gula buat penyedap cerita.....

"Enjin yang di bawa balik tu... cuma bangkai jer... semua komponen penting dah barai beb...., memang la Malaysia tak bayar satu sen pun... sebab nak kena repair dan beli komponen baru bhai....."

Apa punya mangkuk ayun Menteri Malaysia yang bangang dan cuba membangangkan rakyat.... konon AG dah negotiate baik punya.... lawaksss... lawakssss sarkas la... lu orang semua... 
IkutSukaAku.

NGO mahu Felda jamin rizab tunai minimum RM1 bilion..mana ade weh...pitih habis doh...!!!

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:13 PM PDT

KUALA LUMPUR, 2 Julai — Gabungan Wawasan Generasi Felda (GWGF) menggesa Felda, agensi pembangunan tanah persekutuan yang berusia enam dekad, agar memastikan simpanan tunainya tidak kurang RM1 bilion setiap masa.
"Bagi mengelakkan kekeliruan mengenai kedudukan kewangan Felda pada masa akan datang, GWGF mencadangkan pada bila-bila masa kedudukan tunai Felda mestilah tidak kurang dari RM1 bilion," kata Pengerusi GWGF Tan Sri Rozali Ismail dipetik Bernama semalam.
Selain itu, GWGF turut mencadangkan supaya satu Jawatankuasa Pelaburan ditubuhkan di mana sebarang pelaburan Felda yang besar dan melibatkan perbelanjaan tinggi perlu diluluskan oleh jawatankuasa terbabit.
Pandangan ini diberikan ketika timbulnya polemik Felda berhadapan dengan situasi muflis.
Akhbar Suara Keadilan baru-baru ini menyiarkan laporan agensi ini sudah muflis. Pengurusan Felda mengemukakan surat tuntutan permohonan maaf Suara Keadilan dan saman RM200 juta.
GWGF adalah sebuah badan bukan kerajaan (NGO) yang ditubuhkan pada Ogos 2002 dan dianggotai kira-kira 400 orang generasi baru peneroka Felda dari 317 Rancangan Tanah Felda di seluruh negara.
GWGF juga bertindak sebagai penasihat kepada enam persatuan peneroka Felda lain.
Pada 16 Jun lalu, kerajaan pusat secara terbuka mengakui simpanan tunai Felda telah merosot sehingga RM1.35 bilion tahun lalu berbanding paras RM4.08 bilion dimiliki pada 2004.
Bagaimanapun Timbalan Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri Datuk Ahmad Maslan mendakwa penurunan simpanan tunai bukan kerana salah urus Felda.
"Kami tidak pernah salah gunakan dana (Felda)," kata Ahmad di Dewan Rakyat.
Ahmad menambah, meskipun simpanan tunai merosot tetapi aset Felda mengalami peningkatan.
"Simpanan tunai menurun RM2.37 bilion manakala aset meningkat RM6.2 bilion," kata beliau.
Rozali turut berkata GWGF melalui anggotanya yang terdiri daripada peguam bela dan peguam cara akan meneliti tindakan undang-undang sewajarnya kepada pihak yang tidak bertanggungjawab mengelirukan fakta dengan tujuan memecahbelahkan masyarakat peneroka Felda.
"Kita akan lihat tindakan yang boleh diambil terhadap mereka yang cuba memainkan isu ini," katanya.
Beliau meminta warga Felda tidak terpengaruh dengan dakwaan dan tuduhan tidak berasas yang dibuat oleh mereka yang mungkin mempunyai kepentingan peribadi.
Sementara itu, satu memorandum bantahan terhadap akhbar Suara Keadilan dihantar ke ibu pejabat Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) di Damansara semalam oleh anggota GWGF yang diketuai oleh Setiausaha Agung GWGF Datuk Abdullah Abu Bakar.
Memorandum itu membantah laporan Suara Keadilan bertarikh 22-29 Jun lepas yang memaparkan laporan muka depan "Felda Bankrap".
Kata beliau, Felda tidak bankrap sebaliknya kedudukan kewangannya adalah kukuh dan stabil.
"Felda mempunyai kedudukan kewangan yang kukuh yang disokong oleh aset-aset syarikat yang sentiasa meningkat dan bernilai tinggi," katanya.
Beliau berkata GWGF telah mengadakan perbincangan dengan pegawai-pegawai kanan Felda sejak seminggu lepas dan mendapat penjelasan daripada pihak pengurusan tertinggi Felda mengenai kedudukan kewangan dan prestasi lembaga itu.
Rozali berkata walaupun berlaku penurunan kedudukan tunai syarikat dengan pembelian aset-aset yang kukuh dan mempunyai nilai pulangan yang tinggi, ini tidak membimbangkan dan tidak menunjukkan susut nilai pegangan ekuiti Koperasi Permodalan Felda Bhd yang dianggotai oleh peneroka Felda Holdings.

Ulama muda: ‘Kami bukan wakil Asri di Umno’..ha..ha..ha...UMNO VS ULAMA....!!!

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:12 PM PDT

Oleh Syed Mu'az Syed Putra

KUALA LUMPUR, 2 Julai — Kumpulan 40 ulama muda yang menyertai Umno minggu lalu menafikan dakwaan mereka mahu menerapkan pemikiran bekas mufti Perlis Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin dengan menganggotai parti itu.
Jurucakap kumpulan ulama muda itu, Fadlan Mohd Othman, dakwaan yang dibuat itu adalah tidak benar sama sekali kerana Asri tidak mempunyai sebarang kaitan dengan tindakan kumpulan tersebut menyertai Umno.
"Kami menyertai Umno adalah untuk berdakwah kepada masyarakat dengan berlandaskan al-Quran dan sunnah.
"Jadi apa sahaja yang berkaitan dengan al-Quran dan sunnah kita akan terima termasuk daripada Asri. Mudah kata sesiapa yang berada di pihak yang betul kami akan sokong," katanya ketika dihubungi The Malaysian Insider.
Beliau berkata mungkin masyarakat melihat ada persamaan pandangan antara kumpulan ulama itu dengan Asri sehingga menimbulkan salah faham.
"Sebenarnya Asri tiada kena-mengena langsung dengan kami, mungkin ada persamaan tetapi hakikat kami berbeza," kata pensyarah Fakulti Pengajian Islam Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia itu.Fadlan berkata demikian ketika diminta mengulas kenyataan bekas Yang Dipertua Yayasan Dakwah Islamiah Malaysia (Yadim), Datuk Nakhaie Ahmad mendakwa kumpulan ulama tersebut adalah pengikut Asri dan mempunyai agenda tersendiri apabila menyertai parti itu.
Nakhaie berkata Asri menghantar pengikutnya supaya aliran pemikiran dan idealoginya dapat disalurkan ke dalam kepimpinan Umno.
"Ulama yang menyertai Umno baru-baru ini adalah pengikut Asri yang dihantar untuk menyampaikan aliran pemikiran beliau ke dalam Umno.
"Asri menghantar ulama ini dengan harapan mendapat kedudukan yang penting dalam Umno ataupun kerajaan.
"Jadi apabila sudah ada kedudukan yang baik mudah untuk mereka terapkan idealogi Asri," kata Nakhaie merupakan bekas naib presiden PAS yang menyertai Umno dua dekad lalu.
Kumpulan 40 ulama muda menyerahkan borang penyertaan ahli Umno kepada Presiden Datuk Seri Najib Razak Jumaat lalu.
Seorang lagi anggota kumpulan ersebut, Fathul Bari Mat Jahya (gambar) juga menegaskan, pihaknya tidak mempunyai sebarang agenda apabila membuat keputusan untuk menyertai Umno kecuali mahu berdakwah kepada masyarakat.
"Kami hanya mahu berdakwah dengan mendekatkan masyarakat kepada agama dengan berlandaskan al-Quran dan sunah.
"Jadi mana-mana pandangan yang tidak bertentangan dengan agama kami akan terima termasuk daripada Asri," katanya.
Beliau juga meminta supaya tokoh agama di negara ini supaya berganding bahu demi masa depan masyarakat.
"Ini bukan masa untuk kita berbalah antara satu sama lain.
"Sepatutnya kita perlu berganding bahu untuk mendekatkan masyarakat kepada agama," katanya.

Pensyarah: Saya dijemput temu PM, tapi tak sertai Umno..ha.ha..UMNO@APCO...bingai...!!!

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 06:10 PM PDT

Oleh Syed Mu'az Syed Putra

Hosni menafikan laporan dia merupakan antara 40 ulama muda menyertai Umno Jumaat lalu.
SHAH ALAM, 2 Julai — Seorang ulama muda, Mohd Hosni Mubarak Abdul Hamid, yang mendakwa dirinya "diperdaya" agar memasuki Umno minggu lalu menegaskan, dia tidak pernah mengisi borang menyertai parti tersebut sebagaimana dilaporkan sebelum ini. Bagaimanapun Hosni mengakui kehadirannya dalam program Jumaat yang berakhir dengan penyerahan borang adalah kerana diberitahu Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak mahu bertemu dengan mereka yang pernah belajar di Timur Tengah.
"Saya hadir ke program ini kerana diberitahu oleh seorang tokoh agama Umno bahawa Perdana Menteri mahu menemui pelajar-pelajar yang pernah belajar di Timur Tengah.
"Jadi apabila diberitahu begitu saya tanpa syak wasangka bersetuju untuk mengikut tokoh agama menghadiri program itu.
"Namun apabila sampai ke sana lain pula jadi apabila mendapati ramai wartawan dan jurukamera berada di situ sebelum dimaklumkan Perdana Menteri akan hadir untuk menerima borang keanggotaan Umno," katanya kepada The Malaysian Insider ketika ditemui pada program ceramah Ulama Muda Masuk Umno dekat sini.
Hosni, 27, mendakwa dia tidak pernah melihat dan mengisi sebarang borang keanggotaan Umno.
"Saya pegang borang pun tidak macam mana nak isi? Jadi bagaimana boleh kata saya masuk Umno?
"Lagipun saya memang tiada niat untuk masuk Umno... belajar agama tinggi nak masuk Umno buat apa?" kata pensyarah Maahad Tahfiz Integrasi Sains Teknologi Selangor itu.
Sambil menjelaskan dia juga bukan ahli PAS, Hosni berkata, dirinya menggunakan ceramah malam tadi untuk menjelaskan kedudukan dalam isu semasa ini.
Hosni berkata dia tidak mahu orang salah faham dengan apa yang berlaku Jumaat lalu.
Difahamkan selain Hosni terdapat tiga orang yang mendakwa diri mereka "diperdaya".
Bagaimanapun dakwaan mereka telah dinafikan oleh bekas menteri besar Perlis Datuk Seri Shahidan Kassim dan jurucakap kumpulan 40 ulama muda yang menyertai Umno.
Selasa lalu, jurucakap kumpulan 40 ulama itu, Fadlan Mohd Othman menafikan empat orang yang mendakwa diri mereka "diperdaya" untuk memasuki parti BN itu sebagai ahli kumpulan tersebut.
Kumpulan 40 ulama ini menyerahkan borang penyertaan ahli Umno kepada Najib sebelum mesyuarat Majlis Tertinggi Umno.
Sehubungan itu, Fadlan berkata keempat-empat nama mereka yang mendakwa telah diperdaya memang tiada dalam senarai 40 borang yang dikemukakan kepada Najib.
"Nama mereka itu memang tiada dalam senarai saya, saya pun tidak kenal mereka... memang tidak ada.
"Saya sendiri tidak pernah jumpa mereka," kata Fadlan.
Senarai 40 nama itu merupakan kumpulan pertama ulama menyertai Umno.
Dakwaan mereka diperdayakan muncul sehari selepas kumpulan 40 itu menyerahkan borang permohonan keahlian menyertai Umno.
Ketika mengulas lanjut, Hosni berkata dakwaan yang dikatakan dia dan tiga orang ulama muda itu tidak diundang adalah tidak benar sama sekali.
"Kalau saya tidak diundang saya tidak akan datang tapi ini diundang sebab itu saya datang.
"Selain itu ketika berada di sana Shahidan melayan saya dengan baik sekali, kalau tidak diundang kenapa tidak sahaja suruh kami pergi," katanya.

Melayu Mundur Angkara Umno dan Perkasa

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 08:11 AM PDT

 Bangsa Cina gemilang dimana - mana kerana mereka tidak perlu ditakutkan dengan momokan hak mereka dirampas. Bangsa Arab berada merata dunia kerana mereka percaya akan usaha sendiri. Bangsa India berada di mana saja kerana mereka kuat dan yakin untuk mencari sesuap nasi.

Orang Melayu Malaysia, terus lemah dan lemah. Inginkan pangkat hingga terpaksa membodek dan memijak rakan sendiri. Orang Melayu di Malaysia sepatutnya sudah maju kedepan namun malangnya terus dipaksa memegang harapan pada tongkat yang sebenarnya palsu semata. KETUANAN MELAYU, HAK BUMIPUTERA, ORANG MELAYU TERTINDAS dan sebagainya.

Cuba kita renung kembali siapa yang mula - mula merampas kuasa hak raja - raja Melayu? Siapa yang menarik kembali bantuan biasiswa kepada anak - anak Melayu? Siapa yang terus - meneruskan melambatkan usaha mencerdikkan orang Melayu di kampung? Siapa yang melambatkan segala macam perkhidmatan untuk perkampungan Melayu yang dinikmati oleh orang bandar?

Umno dan Perkasa sebenarnya menjahanamkan Melayu secara terus - menerus. Mereka hanya menggerakkan Melayu untuk bertindak ganas dengan provokasi perkauman yang melampau. Tapi pernahkah mereka menggerakkan orang Melayu masuk ke kelas - kelas ilmiah? Tanya pada Ibrahim si Firaun yang berwajahkan katak, apa sumbangan dia untuk mencerdikkan orang Melayu agar berdaya saing dalam ekonomi negara. Sumbangan dia hanya menakutkan orang Melayu terus - meneruskan dengan momokan orang Melayu akan hilang kuasa.

Apabila orang Melayu takut dan mula bergantung harap pada Umno dan Perkasa, mudah bagi mereka untuk terus membodohkan orang Melayu supaya setiap kali pilihanraya berlangsung maka secara automatik undi Melayu diberikan kepada mereka. Laungan Ketuanan Melayu menjamin kemenangan mutlak kepada Umno. Apabila kemenangan berpihak kepada mereka segala macam jenayah yang mereka lakukan akan dapat ditutup. KAMPUNG BEREMBANG, KAMPUNG MEMALI, TANAH ORANG ASLI, KAMPUNG BARU YANG AKAN DILACURKAN, dan segala macam jenayah keatas orang Melayu akan didiamkan dan dihalalkan oleh mereka. Itu belum dikira jenayah menyelamatkan syarikat perkapalan anak kandung sendiri dengan menggunakan dana PETRONAS. Siapa mereka itu? Sila tanya kepada Tun Mahathir Mohamad.

Kerana projek membodohkan Melayu ini berjalan lancar sehingga ada terperangkap dengan momokan bodoh mereka ini. Membodohkan dan membangangkan orang Melayu penting buat Umno dan Perkasa kerana jika Melayu sedar maka siap sedialah Umno akan ditalkinkan. Tambahan dalam keadaan sekarang, di mana orang Cina dan India secara mutlak menolak BN maka usaha terus membangangkan orang Melayu dipertingkatkan. Jika Pakatan Rakyat berjaya mencerdikkan orang Melayu maka selamat tinggal Umno dan Perkasa.

Kenyataan Mahathir dengan mengatakan orang Melayu akan jadi minoriti hanyalah satu lagi kenyataan memperbodohkan Melayu. Macam dia tak pernah melacurkan orang Melayu. Macam dia tidak pernah merogol kuasa raja - raja Melayu. Sekarang mahu jadi wira Melayu. Percaya atau tidak ada yang percaya kerana mereka telah dibodohkan dengan berjaya sekali. Mereka cukup percaya perkara itu akan terjadi kerana kebangkitan Pakatan Rakyat walhal yang menjahanamkan orang Melayu adalah Mahathir.

Melayu akan terus mundur jika percaya kepada propaganda jahat Umno, Mahathir, dan Perkasa. Melayu akan tetap terus menjadi satu bangsa yang kebelakang kerana kalian semua terus - menerus percaya kepada penipuan agung daripada Umno dan Perkasa dan terutama sekali Mahathir. Melayu terpinggir kerana Umno bukannya DAP. Melayu jadi minoriti kerana Umno bukannya DAP.

 by dragsuperstar

Nazri akui peruntukan ditambah, tapi nafi p'raya mengejut..namun begitu ia duit rakyat yang disalahguna...!!!

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 08:00 AM PDT

Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Mohd Nazri Abdul Aziz hari ini mengesahkan bahawa kerajaan menyediakan pertambahan peruntukan RM500,000 untuk kawasan pilihan raya, tetapi menafikan ia menandakan akan berlaku pilihan raya mengejut.

Ketika ditemui wartawan di Parlimen, beliau berkata, pertambahan peruntukan itu diberikan kerana kerajaan mempunyai lebihan dana.

"Ini kerana kita ada lebihan wang, jadi kita berilah peruntukan," katanya.

Menurutnya, kerajaan tidak menyimpan wang dalam bank untuk mendapatkan faedah, tetapi membelanjakannya.

"Ia tidak masuk ke saku saya, tapi untuk pembangunan rakyat," jelas Nazri.

Berikutan terdapat 222 kawasan parlimen, maka peruntukan tambahan tersebut berjumlah RM111 juta.

Menjawab soalan, Nazri menyangkal dakwaan DAP bahawa tambahan peruntukan itu menandakan akan berlaku pilihan raya mengejut.

"Tidak, kami memberikannya setiap tahun, bukan hanya tahun ini, jadi apakah itu bermakna akan ada pilihan raya mengejut setiap tahun?" soalnya.

Malaysian Pavillion : Berapa yang habis? RM20juta ataupun RM35juta?

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 07:35 AM PDT



Berapa kos sebenar pemibinaan astaka Malaysia di Expo Dunia Shanghai? RM20juta ataupun RM35juta?

Dalam jawapan yang diberi oleh YB Timbalan Menteri Pelancongan kepada ucapan penangguhan saya di Dewan Rakyat semalam, 30 Jun 2010 menyatakan bahawa "Bagi pembinaan astaka Malaysia, RM20juta telah diperuntukkan di mana kos ini adalah termasuk kos reka bentuk, membina, menyelenggara dan merobohkan astaka setelah selesai tempoh pameran." (http://teresakok.com/2010/07/01/jawapan-menteri-pelancongan-terhadap-ucapan-penangguhan-saya-mengenai-pavilion-msia-di-shanghai/)

Walau bagaimanapun, apabila saya menyemak jawapan yang diberi oleh Kementerian Pelancongan kepada YB Fong Po Kuan dari Batu Gajah pada 15 Jun 2010, ia berbunyi: "Secara keseluruhannya, negara membelanjakan RM35juta bagi pembinaan dan operasi astaka Malaysia di Ekspo Dunia Shanghai yang berlangsung selama enam bulan."

Jadi, jawapan manakah yang betul? Apakah kos pembinaan dan penyelenggaraan ataupun operasi sebenar astaka Malaysia di Ekspo Dunia Shanghai? RM20juta ataupun RM35juta?

Berdasarkan jawapan yang bercanggah yang diberi oleh Kementerian Perlancongan kepada dua Ahli Parlimen ini, saya ingin merujuk Menteri Perlancongan kepada Jawatankuasa Hak dan Kebebasan berdasarkan Peraturan Mesyuarat Parlimen 36(12) yang berbunyi: "Mana mana ahli yang mengeluarkan kenyataan yang mengelirukan Dewan adalah disifatkan menghina Majlis dan ahli itu boleh dirujuk kepada Jawatankuasa Hak dan Kebebasan bagi kesalahan itu."

Tetapi, kesalnya, Yang DiPertua Dewan Rakyat YB Tan Sri Pandikar Amin tidak menerima usul saya manakala beliau menyalahkan jawapan yang saling bercanggahan itu kepada pegawai kerajaan yang menyediakan jawapan, selain itu, beliau kata Peraturan Mesyuarat 36(12) haruslah berdasarkan "prima facie" dan samada Menteri mempunyai niat untuk memberi maklumat yang salah kepada Parlimen.

Sehubungan dengan itu YB Tan Sri Pandikar menghendaki pihak kementerian untuk memberi penjelasan tentang jawapan dalam kes ini di Parlimen. Beberapa Ahli Parlimen Pakatan Rakyat telah menyuarakan ketidakpuasan mereka terhadap keputusan YB Tan Sri Pandikar Amin kerana prinsip yang sama tidak digunakan dalam kes YB Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim yang dirujuk ke Jawatankuasa Hak dan Kebebasan.

Saya berpendapat Tan Sri Yang Dipertua seharusnya mengarahkan Menteri Pelancongan untuk memberi penjelasan di Parlimen dan memohon maaf di dewan yang mulia ini, kerana kenyataan Kementerian Pelancongan memang telah bercanggah dengan fasal 36(12) dalam Peraturan Mesyuarat Dewan Rakyat. Kalau tidak, adalah lebih baik fasal 36(12) dalam Peraturan Mesyuarat Dewan Rakyat dimansuhkan.

Teresa Kok 

FELDA Tidak Bankrap, Kewangan Stabil - Rozali

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 07:21 AM PDT

SUBANG: FELDA tidak bankrap sebaliknya kedudukan kewangannya adalah kukuh dan stabil, tegas Pengerusi Gabungan Wawasan Generasi FELDA (GWGF), Tan Sri Rozali Ismail hari ini.
"FELDA mempunyai kedudukan kewangan yang kukuh yang disokong oleh aset-aset syarikat yang sentiasa meningkat dan bernilai tinggi," katanya dalam sidang media di sini.
Beliau berkata GWGF telah mengadakan perbincangan dengan pegawai-pegawai kanan FELDA sejak seminggu lepas dan mendapat penjelasan daripada pihak pengurusan tertinggi FELDA mengenai kedudukan kewangan dan prestasi lembaga itu.
Rozali berkata walaupun berlaku penurunan kedudukan tunai syarikat dengan pembelian aset-aset yang kukuh dan mempunyai nilai pulangan yang tinggi, ini tidak membimbangkan dan tidak menunjukkan susut nilai pegangan ekuiti Koperasi Permodalan FELDA Bhd yang dianggotai oleh para peneroka dalam FELDA Holdings. "Bagi mengelakkan kekeliruan mengenai kedudukan kewangan FELDA pada masa akan datang, GWGF mencadangkan pada bila-bila masa kedudukan tunai FELDA mestilah tidak kurang dari RM1 bilion," katanya.
Rozali berkata GWGF turut mencadangkan supaya satu Jawatankuasa Pelaburan ditubuhkan di mana sebarang pelaburan FELDA yang besar dan melibatkan perbelanjaan tinggi perlu diluluskan oleh jawatankuasa terbabit.
Rozali turut berkata GWGF melalui anggotanya yang terdiri daripada peguam bela dan peguam cara akan meneliti tindakan undang-undang sewajarnya kepada pihak yang tidak bertanggungjawab mengelirukan fakta dengan tujuan memecahbelahkan masyarakat peneroka FELDA.
"Kita akan lihat tindakan yang boleh diambil terhadap mereka yang cuba memainkan isu ini," katanya.
Beliau meminta warga FELDA tidak terpengaruh dengan dakwaan dan tuduhan tidak berasas yang dibuat oleh mereka yang mungkin mempunyai kepentingan peribadi.
GWGF adalah sebuah badan bukan kerajaan (NGO) yang ditubuhkan pada Ogos 2002 dan dianggotai kira-kira 400 orang generasi baru peneroka FELDA dari 317 Rancangan Tanah FELDA di seluruh negara.
GWGF juga bertindak sebagai penasihat kepada enam persatuan peneroka FELDA lain.
Sementara itu, satu memorandum bantahan terhadap akhbar Suara Keadilan dihantar ke ibu pejabat Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) di Damansara hari ini oleh anggota GWGF yang diketuai oleh Setiausaha Agung GWGF Datuk Abdullah Abu Bakar.
Memorandum itu membantah laporan Suara Keadilan bertarikh 22-29 Jun lepas yang memaparkan laporan muka depan "Felda Bankrap". -BERNAMA

Jangan engkau kahwini wanita yang enam

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 07:14 AM PDT





Jangan engkau kahwini wanita yang enam, jangan yang ANANAH, yang MANANAH, dan yang HANANAH, dan jangan engkau kahwini yang HADAQAH, yang BARAQAH dan yang SYADAQAH."

1- Wanita Ananah:-
Wanita yang banyak mengeluh dan mengadu dan tiap saat memperalatkan sakit atau berpura-pura sakit.

2- Wanita Mananah:-
Wanita yang suka mengungkit-ngungkit terhadap suaminya. Wanita ini sering menyatakan seperti ini: "Aku membuat itu keranamu".

3- Wanita Hananah:-
Wanita yang menyatakan kasih sayangnya kepada suaminya yang lain, yang dikahwininya sebelum ini atau kepada anaknya dari suami yang lain.

4- Wanita Hadaqah:-
Wanita yang melemparkan pandangan dan matanya pada tiap sesuatu, lalu menyatakan keinginannya untuk memiliki barang itu dan memaksa suaminya untuk membelinya.

5- Wanita Baraqah: -
1) Wanita yang sepanjang hari mengilatkan dan menghias mukanya.
2) Wanita yang marah ketika makan dan tidak mahu makan kecuali sendirian dan diasingkannya bahagiannya.

6- Wanita Syadaqah:-
Wanita yang banyak bercakap perkara yang lagha dan lagi membisingkan.

Sumber rujukan TS : Imam Al Ghazali

Ibrahim Katak Tidak Perkasa Lagi...

Posted: 01 Jul 2010 07:07 AM PDT

"Orang biadab tidak layak berada dalam Kabinet."

Perghhh... itulah kenyataan keras Presiden Perkasa, kepada Timbalan Menteri Pelajaran, Datuk Dr. Wee Ka Siong yang dianggapnya tidak memahami perlembagaan negara.

Hebat... hebat sungguh kenyataan Beghahim Ali terhadap Ketua Pemuda MCA ini. Sembang kedai kopi ada yang berkata ketika Ibrahim membuat kenyataan itu elok juga diberikan cermin kepadanya supaya boleh dia cerminkan dirinya terlebih dahulu, kerana si Raja Katak ni lebih biadap dari Wee Ka Siong.

Justeru itu, apa yang diperkatakan oleh Wee Ka Siong adalah fakta. Wee tidak menyarankan agar pinjaman MARA di tarik balik, Wee cuma membandingkan apa yang dikempenkan oleh Najib Nazak, iaitu gagasan 1 Malaysia. Itu saja, dan sejak bila pula Melayu menjadi sensitif.

Bagi KJ pulak, nasihat mudah teruskan saja perjuangan dan apa yang beliau rasakan benar. Jika KJ tidak mempertahankan Wee Ka Siong yang diserang oleh sawan gila babi si Raja Katak baru baru ini, tentu sekali sudah ada perbalahan di antara Pemuda UMNO dan juga Pemuda MCA.

Si Raja Katak tu peduli apa, dia bukan ahli UMNO dan dia bertanding pun atas tiket PAS dan tidak tahu mengenang budi dan jasa yang diberikan oleh PAS, malahan di serangnya pula, tambahan lagi katak ni dah tidak berparti. Apa yang dia peduli kalau ada pergaduhan antara komponen parti. (Bagi gua... kalau gaduh pun bagus jugak.. ha..ha..ha.. cepat sikit jahanam.)

PERKASA ditubuhkan untuk kepentingan politiknya kerana dia sudah sampai ke penghujung longkang, cuma menunggu masa untuk masuk ke lubang taik dan sudah tidak boleh melompat lagi.

Jadi Agendanya melalui Perkasa hanya menyebut akan nasib Melayu (bangsa) sajalah untuk meraih sokongan dan simpati karier politiknya yang dah makin nak mampus tu. Hanya melayu2 bangang dan bodoh sahaja yang menyokong perjuangan Perkasa.

Lu orang rasa... si biadap ni yang selalu bercakap dan menghasut soal perkauman ni.. patut di ISA kan atau tidak..., kenapa tiada tindakan dari KDN...? Mengapa masih si biarkan si katak ini terus bebas melompat dan melolong... 
IkutSukaAku
Dicatat oleh di

Tiada ulasan:

Catat Ulasan

Langgan: Catat Ulasan (Atom)